But soon realized that good urban design is about much more than construction materials. ... The problems with modern urban design... Infrastructure and sprawl ...
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Changing the Paradigm
Applying New Urbanist land use and urban design principles in Austin
As an early step, we invited national consultant Robert Gibbs to rate Austin’s commercial development.
On a scale of 0-10, Austin’s score was between0 and 1.
But soon realized that good urban design is about much more than construction materials.
Post-war development patterns produce greater traffic than traditional urban development patterns.
Lack of interconnectivity
Large single use developments
Every trip funneled on to highways
Employees in highway-based business districts produce a 1,500% greater impact on roads than employees in downtown business districts.
Urban Land Institute
Big box sites are 6 to 10 blocks in size.
A form-based code describes what the community wants instead of what it doesn’t want.
(Or at least isn’t worth the headache.)
Design Standards: Over 200 stakeholders from diverse groups including--
. . . about a zillion marked-up drafts. . .
And many important lessons learned.
The Vertical Mixed-Use Overlay
Plus, the Overlay made parking reductions voluntary, and allowed parallel or head-in “teaser” parking.
. . . But had all the normal fears about density and traffic.
Plus, height was non-negotiable.
The McMansion Ordinance
• Promote high quality density on corridors.
• Protect single family neighborhoods.
• Create a second downtown in North Austin.
• Create dense urban town centers at rail stops.
Austin City Council Member