POVERTY REDUCTION IN VIET NAM: DISHARMONIES BEHIND THE IMPRESSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Slide1 l.jpg
Download
1 / 23

  • 289 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: Travel / Places

Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Tokyo, May 29-30, 2006. POVERTY REDUCTION IN VIET NAM: DISHARMONIES BEHIND THE IMPRESSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS. by Le Thuc Duc, Nguyen Thang and Vu Hoang Dat, Viet Nam Academy of Social Sciences, Ha Noi. The Contents.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

POVERTY REDUCTION IN VIET NAM: DISHARMONIES BEHIND THE IMPRESSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Tokyo, May 29-30, 2006

POVERTY REDUCTION IN VIET NAM: DISHARMONIES BEHIND THE IMPRESSIVE ACHIEVEMENTS

by

Le Thuc Duc, Nguyen Thang and Vu Hoang Dat,

Viet Nam Academy of Social Sciences, Ha Noi


The contents l.jpg

The Contents

  • Economic growth and poverty reduction

  • Inequality at glance

  • An identification of the poor

  • A regional consideration

  • Rural versus urban inequality

  • An econometric analysis of ethnic gap: why it may increase?

  • Conclusions


Economic growth in viet nam 1993 2003 l.jpg

Economic growth in Viet Nam 1993-2003


Population density on expenditures l.jpg

Population density on expenditures


Poverty rates through surveys 1993 2004 l.jpg

Poverty rates through surveys: 1993 - 2004


Inequality in gini coefficient l.jpg

Inequality in GINI coefficient


Determinants of provinces poverty rate l.jpg

Determinants of provinces poverty rate

Population distribution on expenditures


Slide8 l.jpg

An identification of the poor


Who are the poor continue l.jpg

Who are the poor? (continue)


Who are the poor continue10 l.jpg

Who are the poor? (continue)


Who are the poor continue11 l.jpg

Who are the poor? (continue)


Who are the poor continue12 l.jpg

Who are the poor? (continue)


Slide13 l.jpg

Regional differences


Urban rural inequality l.jpg

Urban/Rural inequality


Ethnic gap in poverty rates l.jpg

Ethnic gap in poverty rates


Population density on expenditure ethnic minority vs majority l.jpg

Population density on expenditure: Ethnic minority vs. majority


Why ethnic gap may increase l.jpg

Why ethnic gap may increase?

  • The left hand side is the 2004’s per capita expenditures

  • Among the right hand side variables: “ethnicity” dummy, the “ethnicity” times “road to commune centre”, “ethnicity” times to other levels of education

  • Those serve to measure the difference in the returns on their education and in the effect of roads between the ethnic minority and majority groups


Why ethnic gap may increase results l.jpg

Why ethnic gap may increase: results


Why ethnic gap may increase results19 l.jpg

Why ethnic gap may increase: results


Why ethnic gap may increase continue l.jpg

Why ethnic gap may increase? (continue)


Concluding remarks l.jpg

Concluding remarks

  • Even though the overall of poverty reduction in Viet Nam over 1993-2004 is really impressive, we see some cause for concern

  • Urban/rural gap in poverty has been clear. That gap can be decomposed into the difference in factors (such as education, roads, clinics, and market) and the difference in the marginal effects of the factors. The former is found significant, but the latter is weak and mixed


Concluding remarks continue l.jpg

Concluding remarks (continue)

  • The ethnic gap consists of the difference in factors (education, roads,...), and the difference in marginal effects of the factors. Both are significant: the returns on education and the marginal benefit of roads all for the ethnic minorities are lower than that to Kinh&Chinese.

  • The differences in poverty between regions are mainly due to the differences in ratios of urban and population of ethnic groups. Other factors include condition for migration and therefore the remittances.

  • It is essential to safeguard inclusiveness of development. That requires a mobilization of development fund for the remote isolated localities and an efficient use of the development resources.


Slide23 l.jpg

THANK YOU


  • Login