Euthanasia
Download
1 / 9

Euthanasia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 1889 Views
  • Updated On :

Euthanasia. Passive Euthanasia: refusing to continue medical treatment, leading to death Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Killing someone with their consent for the sake of relieving suffering.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Euthanasia' - Jimmy


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Euthanasia l.jpg
Euthanasia

  • Passive Euthanasia: refusing to continue medical treatment, leading to death

  • Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Killing someone with their consent for the sake of relieving suffering.

  • Non-voluntary Active Euthanasia: killing a person not competent to give consent in order to relieve suffering

  • Involuntary Active Euthanasia: killing someone for the sake of relieving suffering without consent when they are capable of giving consent.


Reasons to support vol active euthanasia l.jpg
Reasons to support Vol. Active Euthanasia

  • Voluntary euthanasia grants a person greater self-determination over their life (and death)

    A large part of human dignity lies in the ability people have to control their own lives.

    2 Sometimes a person may legitimately judge that they are better off dead. Euthanasia allows these people an escape from horrendous suffering.


Slide3 l.jpg


Is there a moral difference between killing and letting die l.jpg
Is there a moral difference between killing and letting die? and therefore wrong.

  • Brock: both are killing. A greedy son who takes life support away from his mother is just as guilty of murder as one who “actively” kills.

  • Is this true?

  • Maybe in this case the culpability is the same. But there might still be a difference.


Slide5 l.jpg


Good consequences of euthanasia l.jpg
Good consequences of euthanasia case of death is not the end of treatment, but the underlying disease

  • It would be possible to respect the self-determination of competent patients who want it.

  • It would reassure the large number of people who want to have the option of euthanasia

  • Some pain and suffering can only be relieved by euthanasia (psychological as well as physical pain).


Potential bad consequences l.jpg
Potential bad consequences case of death is not the end of treatment, but the underlying disease

  • Undermine moral center of medicine, “first, do no harm”

  • Weaken society’s commitment to provide care for dying patients (its easier to kill them)

    Some patients may feel pressured to accept death because of a felt burden

    There may be a slip into non-voluntary euthanasia


Slide8 l.jpg

  • Brock: voluntary euthanasia would likely increase patients faith in medicine, not decrease it.

  • Availability of pass euthanasia has not resulted in a loss of the quality of care for dying patients. Also the avail of passive euthanasia has not lead to large percentages of people taking this option


Slide9 l.jpg

  • The slip to non-voluntary euthanasia can be made less likely by the guidelines on page 87

  • But its true the reasons for voluntary euthanasia may also apply to non-voluntary euthanasia (a surrogate making the decision for an incompetent patient.

  • Brock thinks non-voluntary euth. May be justified in some cases.


ad