1 / 63

Actuarial Society of Greater New York Overview of the Health Reinsurance Market

Actuarial Society of Greater New York Overview of the Health Reinsurance Market. Michael L. Frank Donald J. Rusconi Aquarius Capital May 27, 2009. Copyright and Disclaimer.

Jimmy
Download Presentation

Actuarial Society of Greater New York Overview of the Health Reinsurance Market

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Actuarial Society of Greater New YorkOverview of the Health Reinsurance Market Michael L. Frank Donald J. Rusconi Aquarius Capital May 27, 2009

  2. Copyright and Disclaimer The material contained in this presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes by Aquarius Capital Solutions Group LLC (Aquarius). The material is based on sources believed to be reliable and/or from proprietary data developed by Aquarius, but we do not represent as to its accuracy or its completeness. The content of this presentation is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. This document and its contents are proprietary to Aquarius. Neither this document nor its contents may be copied or reproduced in any manner without the express consent of Aquarius. Any requests or questions about this material should be forwarded to asny-questions@aquariuscapital.com.

  3. Biography of Aquarius • 20+ Years Experience - Life, Accident & Health • Specialties – Insurance, HMO, Reinsurance & Employee Benefits • Services – Actuarial, Brokering/Consulting, Financial Analysis & Modeling, Reinsurance, U/Wing, Risk Mgmt • Credentials: ASA, FCA, MAAA, CFA® • Actuarial Society of Greater NY, Chairperson for Continuing Education • Society of Actuaries - Section Councils: • Current: Reinsurance Section, Entrepreneurial Actuarial Section • Retired: Actuary of the Future Section • Various NAIC/AAA Committees & Task Forces • Other Credentials • Licensed life, accident and health broker (25+ states) • Licensed reinsurance intermediary & managing general underwriter • Licensed life settlement broker • Listed Arbitrator for Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) • Associate, American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) • Other: Speak at Industry Meetings, Publish Articles, Industry Committees • Website: www.aquariuscapital.com

  4. Overview • Who Purchases Reinsurance? • What Product Lines are Reinsured • Why Companies Purchased Reinsurance? • Types of Reinsurance Structures • History of the Market/Capacity • Reinsurance Opportunities • Sample Transactions (Cases #1-3) • Employer Stop Loss Insurance Market • Finite Risk/Structured Risk Finance

  5. Reinsurance Purchasers (Accident & Health) • Insurance Carriers • Program Managers on Behalf of Carrier Clients • Managing General Underwriters (MGUs) • Third Party Administrators (TPAs) • Marketing Entities/General Agencies • Reinsurers/Retrocessionaires • Captive Insurance Companies • Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) • Medical Provider Groups (“Risk Taking”) • Employer Groups (“Self-Funded”) • Disease Management Companies

  6. Underlying Product Lines Reinsured (Accident & Health) • Shorter Tail Coverage • Medical – Traditional, Consumer Driven, Limited Medical • Dental • Vision • Disability Income • Group Life and AD&D – Combined with health coverage • Longer Tail Coverage • Long Term Care • Long Term Disability • Medicare Supplement • Other (Hybrids) • HMO/Provider Excess Reinsurance • Accident Medical Coverage • Self-Funded Stop Loss Reinsurance • Disease Management Carve-Outs

  7. Reasons for Reinsurance Purchase • “Intellectual Capital” • Entry into new markets • Risk-Based Capital (“Surplus”) Relief • Regulatory Requirements • Remove volatility in results (risk transfer of catastrophic events) • Mitigate experience on new product offers (quota share) • Reduce exposure to catastrophic claims (excess of loss) • Leveraged Return on Capital – See Sample Cases • Not a vehicle to “dump loses on ignorant capacity”

  8. Reinsurance Structures • Quota Share • Variable Quota Share • Yearly Renewable Term (YRT) • Aggregate (Excess of Loss) • Retrospective Premium Adjustments (“Swing Rate”) • Contracts with Maximum Limit Caps • Insolvency Coverage • Letter of Credit • Surety Bond • Parental Guarantees (“Keepwell” Agreement) • Separate Accounts & Cell Structures Note: A&H market borrowed many concepts from P&C market!

  9. The Reinsurer’s Perspective – The Reinsurance Food Chain • Employer contracts with carrier • Fully insured arrangement • Self-funded: specific and/or aggregate stop loss • Carrier’s administration options: • Provided directly to employer • Outsourced admin and/or marketing through TPA • Outsourced underwriting through MGU • Reinsurer assumes risk from carrier • Multiple reinsurers/retrocessionaires

  10. Reinsurance Food Chain – TPA Traditional TPA ASO (UHC, Cigna, Aetna, BCBS) Contract with employer group. Direct relationship with employer group or groups retail broker. Receives administrative fee on a per EE basis. Provides stop loss directly to group or shopped by broker/consulting house. Network management and claim payment. Provides reporting to employer, MGU, Carrier/Reinsurer. Have their own stop loss product. • Contract with provider network (PPO) and employer group. • Direct relationship with self-funded employer group. • Receives administrative fee on a per EE basis or % of premium. • Pays claims and places stop loss reinsurance for group. • Medical management services directly or through another vendor. • Provides reporting to employer, MGU, Carrier/Reinsurer.

  11. Reinsurance Food Chain – MGU Retail MGU Reinsurance MGU Contract with Reinsurer. Underwrites blocks of stop loss reinsurance business written by Carrier/TPA/MGU. Business referred by Reinsurance Intermediary. Receives fee on a % of premium basis with potential profit commission. Adjudicates reinsurance claims Handles reinsurance/retrocession reporting Audits of underlying MGU/Issuing Carrier • Contract with Issuing Carrier of stop loss reinsurance. • Underwrites stop loss reinsurance for self-funded groups (spec/agg.) • Business referred by TPA or may have own distribution. • Receives fee on a % of premium basis with potential profit commission. • Adjudicates retail stop loss claims • Marketing/broker credentialing • May handle reinsurer reporting for Issuing Carrier.

  12. Reinsurance Food Chain – Reinsurance Intermediary • Places reinsurance between carrier, reinsurer and retrocessionaire(s) if applicable • Quota Share, Portfolio Excess (specific, aggregate, etc.) • Receives fee on a % of premium basis • May be responsible for bordereaux reporting to reinsurer(s) and retrocessionaire(s) • May handle reinsurance agreement/contract development.

  13. Reinsurance Terminology • Premium • Claims • Loss Ratio – Expenses divided by Premium • Gross vs Net? • Intermediary (brokerage) fees – if applicable • Various parameters may be incorporated to handle reinsurance transaction • Experience Refund or Profit Commission • Ceding Commission (Used for Case #1) • Future Premium • Deductibles (Attachment Points for Aggregate) • Reserves • Other

  14. Reinsurance Agreement • Treaty vs Slip • Inclusions: • Underwriting Guidelines -- may include MGU provisions • May define process for facultative underwriting • Claims Notification – may include TPA provisions • Bordereaux Reporting • Other Provisions: • Funds Held Provision • Commutations – Settlement of Liabilities • “Poison Pills” - Ratings Downgrading, Change of Control • Extra-contractual obligations • Arbitration Clause

  15. History of Reinsurance Profitable Period (Late 1980’s – early 1990’s) • Less Capacity • Purchaser less focused on cost of reinsurance • Smaller “slice of the expense pie” • Impact: • High medical trend • Market accepted high premium trend • High margin allowed room for mistakes • Reinsured less focused on cost of reinsurance

  16. Who were the traditional medical reinsurers? P&C and Life Reinsurers!

  17. History of Reinsurance • Unprofitable Period (mid 1990’s – 2000) • Many reinsurers experienced poor loss ratios • Stop Loss: specific > 125%; aggregate > 200% • Too much capacity including reinsurance MGUs • Major exodus in 1998 & 1999 • Retrocessionaires lose $ in pools • e.g., Workers Comp, many other pools • True-up of historical reserves – Unanticipated Losses

  18. History of Reinsurance • Unprofitable Period(mid 1990’s- 2000) • Losses were due to a combination of all of the following • Capacity in mid 90’s significantly greater than the early 90’s (Market Pressure drives rates downward) • Non-risk-bearing entities (e.g., MGUs) were writing for fee income • Uncontrolled expenses • Ineffective underwriting and pricing for managed care • Sold rates were materially below manual rates • Reserve strengthening from prior underwriting years

  19. History of Reinsurance – Companies Exit Medical Reinsurance Arena Many Companies in Market in 90’s Out by 2002/03: • Swiss Re • Sun Life • Transamerica Re • CNA • Lincoln • D&H Note: More than 30 companies exited market! • General American • Guardian • Life Re • AUL • ManuLife • Phoenix Mutual • Many others

  20. History of Reinsurance – Today Mixed Results Period(mid 2004 to today) • Mergers & Acquisitions – Many consolidations • Growth in limited medical plans • Still significant stop loss direct writers (>25) • Limited medical reinsurance capacity for A&H (<5) • Limited HMO reinsurance/provider excess writers • Limited fully insured quota share capacity • Reinsurance MGUs becoming extinct (not direct MGUs) • Change in the “finite risk” or financial reinsurance market

  21. History of Reinsurance – Impact of “Disputed” or Litigious Claims on Reinsurance Financials • Disputed claims have become a common practice in reinsurance in late 90’s and today due to historical losses • Workers Comp, LMX, reinsurance pools • Reinsurers have been assessing the likelihood of legal settlements • Claim Valuation/Reserving: Art vs. Science? • Time will tell based on empirical data (actual settlements) • Will influence business today & going forward

  22. Evaluating Opportunities • Internal risk margin, RBC, and ROE requirements • Quality of potential business partner(s) • Medical claim costs & leveraged trend • Environmental factors • Reviewing the reinsurance contract

  23. Evaluating Opportunities – Quality of Business Partner(s) • Who performs various functions? • Actuarial, underwriting, claims, marketing, etc. • Carrier (Ceding Company) vs. Reinsurer vs. third party • Considerations: • Reputation and track record • Level and breadth of expertise • Compensation and incentives • Critical Mass vs. Start up • Business goals: growth, profit, core business, etc.

  24. Evaluating Opportunities – Types of Large Claims • Organ Transplants • High Tech Cardiovascular • Neurological Conditions • Cancer • High Risk Maternity & Neonates • Severe Trauma Including Burns • Other Catastrophic Illnesses • HIV/AIDS • High Cost Prescription Drugs • Factor VIII

  25. ReinsuranceCritical Success Factors • Requires strong financial underwriting by a reinsurer • Different state jurisdictions (local Department of Insurance) • Will have different regulatory requirements • Varying RBC standards • Varying reinsurance rules/interpretations • How well does reinsurer understand underlying business being reinsured? • Reinsurers may have different or additional reporting requirements than the plan is accustomed to, including specified turnaround times for reporting.

  26. Critical Success Factors(Continued) • May not be accepted by reinsurer or ceding company’s executive management • Not comfortable with the concept - - especially finite risk deals • Assuming insolvency risk or credit risk • Each ceding company will require a unique solution. • This will change your organization’s financial statements • Do all parties understand amount of risk transferred?

  27. Sample Case #1(Surplus Relief & Leverage Return on Income) • Multi-line insurance company • Writes $100 million of annual premiums • RBC formula requires more than $40 million in capital • Reinsurer • Provides (assumes) 50% of the quota-share • On paper - $50 million in premium and the same % of the total risk, 50%. • Transaction - Quota share w/ sliding scale ceding (administrative expense) allowance • The profit and income levels of the plan may be achieved based on a sliding scale ceding commission or experience refund component.

  28. Sample Case #1 (Cont.) • Insurance company receives reserve credit since claims reinsured. • Transaction is written on a funds held basis, thereby ceding company has a large working fund to pay underlying claims and administrative expenses. • Company may free up significant capital to manage the business or reinvest into the company (surplus/RBC relief). • Cost may be more efficient than borrowing capital from: • Venture capital market - Would want ownership plus high costs. • Parent company – May be challenged to allocate capital if competing with other ventures and product lines.

  29. Sample Case #1 (Sample Financials – 50% Quota Share Reinsurance)

  30. Drivers of RBC Formula for A&H • Premium • Incurred Claims • Reserves (Incurred & Unpaid Claims) • Morbidity Assumptions • Discount Rates

  31. Disease Management Reinsurance (Case #2) • Disease Management Company (DMC) assumes risk from HMO • DMC guarantees (e.g., 10%) reduction in post acute cost due to: • better contracts • reduced admits • reduced length of stay (LOS) • HMO requires guaranteed savings • Letter of credit from DMC to assume risk reserve transfer (3 months capitation) • DMC obtains a reinsurance policy to protect against insolvency

  32. REINSURER DISEASE MGMT CO. INTERMEDIARY HMO CONSULTANT(S) DIRECT BROKER/GA EMPLOYER The Disease Management Co. Reinsurance “Food Chain” – Case #2

  33. Is Reinsurance Cheaper than Borrowing from Capital Markets? Is Capital Available from Parent Company?

  34. Sample Case Study – Multi Year Portfolio Aggregate Stop Loss (Case #3) • Insurance Company buys a three (3) year aggregate stop loss to smooth earnings. • Goal to handle adverse experience for a non-performing (exiting) line of business • Years 2 & 3 - Attachment points in at highest level • Increase with trend (inflation) and prior experience • Losses carried by reinsurer on its balance sheet for Years 1 and 2. • Year 2 & 3 - Functions as a “sleep” cover • Deficit (carry forward) handled through risk charges. • Premium to buy coverage potentially tax deductible to insurance company.

  35. Aggregate Stop Loss - Case #3 (BEFORE Reinsurance)

  36. Aggregate Stop Loss - Case #3 (Continued) • Premium = $2 million per year • Coverage Period = 3 years • Claims Attachment Points • Year 1 = Coverage for total claims > $84.5 million • Year 2 = Above $120.0 million • Year 3 = Above $135.0 million • Maximum Benefit = $25 million

  37. Aggregate Stop Loss - Case #3 (AFTER Reinsurance)

  38. Employer Stop Loss – Innovations? • Underwriting tools • Aggregating specific deductibles (ASDs) • Lasers • Marketing • PEOs and employee-leasing firms • Associations • Potential FAS 106 or GASB 45 Solutions for OPEB • Underlying benefit plan design • Consumer-driven and mini-med plans • Carving out certain benefit categories, e.g., Rx or transplants • Different cost sharing arrangements, e.g., monthly deductibles • Can TPA/carrier administer plans as written or priced? • Pricing “innovations” require more sophisticated modeling

  39. Employer Stop Loss – Aggregating Specific Deductibles (ASDs) • Additional deductible or retention for ceding company • Functions as cost shifting exercise to reduce premium • Unique to per person excess of loss coverage • Lowers plan costs • After reaching individual deductibles, claims not paid until exceeding an additional aggregate deductible • Used to offset rate (inflation) increases • Aggregating Deductible traditionally a multiple of deductible (e.g., 2, 3 or 4 times specific deductible)

  40. Employer Stop Loss – “Lasers” • Additional deductible or retention for ceding company, for specifically identified individual(s) • Functions as cost shifting exercise to reduce premium • Lowers plan costs by increasing individual deductibles • Underwriting tool to combat anti-selection, separating “known” versus “unknown” risk • May be viewed negatively by some market participants • “Singling out individuals is not insurance” • The alternative might be reinsurers not quoting or rating up to cover this non-lasered cost • Lasers may be placed separately or in combination • Combination lasers may resemble ASDs or be contingent upon factors such as loss ratio

  41. Disclosure Statements What information is requested on a disclosure statement? • Individuals currently disabled or confined in a medical facility/hospital • Individuals pre-certified within the last three months. • Individuals that received medical services during the current plan year the cost of which exceeds the lesser of, 50% of the lowest Specific Retention Amount applied for or $50,000, and for which bills have been received and processed by the by the Claims Administrator (TPA) and entered into their Claims System. • Individuals that have been identified as a candidate for Case Management and as having the potential to exceed during the policy period, the lesser of, 50% of the lowest Specific Retention Amount applied for, or $50,000. • Individuals that have been diagnosed, during the current plan year, with a condition represented by any of the ICD-9 codes contained in the attached list and have also received medical services costing $5,000 during the same period.

  42. Employer Stop Loss – Definitions • Specific Advanced Funding – cash flow assistance for specific stop loss claims once specific deductible has been paid in full. • Specific Terminal Liability – provides paid claim run-out protection on specific stop loss if the employer terminates stop loss policy. • Aggregate Accommodation – cash flow assistance for aggregate claims in the event year-to-date paid claims exceed the ytd aggregate attachment point. • Aggregate Terminal Liability – provides paid claim run-out protection on aggregate claims if the employer terminates stop loss policy. • Contract Basis – defines dates of service and payment periods (e.g., 12/15 is incurred in twelve months, paid within fifteen months).

  43. Risk Attaching vs. Incurred Contract • Risk Attaching – duration of risk responsibility within a treaty year of reinsurance contract based on employer effective dates. • Treaty year 2009 reflects all employers groups written between 1/2009 – 12/2009. • Paid claim risk could extend out to 11/2011. Here’s how… • Employer group effective 12/2009 to 11/2010 with a Contract Type of 12/24 (incurred in 12 paid in 24.) • Total of 35 months before one treaty year is complete. • Most typical reinsurance contract between a carrier and reinsurer • Incurred – duration of risk responsibility within a treaty year of reinsurance contract based on date of service (incurred date.) • Treaty year 2009 reflects all claims with a date of service between 1/2009 – 12/2009. • Treaty year complete when last payment of 2009 incurred claims is made.

  44. Employer Stop Loss – Modeling • Are there any operational changes, i.e., changes in administration, claims, marketing, etc.? • Changes in plan design, underlying plans and stop loss plans? • Do you expect any impact from behavioral changes, e.g., “ownership” of an HRA or HSA account? • Will the claim run-out pattern change? • Is data sufficient and appropriate? • Are the assumptions appropriate?

  45. Employer Stop Loss – Modeling (cont.) • Appropriate Reserving Methodologies • Chain Ladder method (development/completion factors) • Bornhuetter Ferguson method – combines results from chain ladder method with expected claim loss ratios. • Appropriate Frequency and Severity distributions • Changes in the frequency claims at different claim intervals • Changes in the severity or intensity of services • Adequate Leverage Trend Assumptions

  46. What is “Leveraged” Trend? Leverage Trend

  47. Leveraged Trend (Example) • 2007 Ground-up claim = $100,000 Specific deductible = $50,000 Claim in excess of deductible = $50,000 1st dollar trend = 13.5% • 2008 Ground-up claim = $113,500 ($100,000 * 1.135) Specific deductible = $50,000 Claim in excess of deductible = $63,500Trend on excess portion of claim = 27% ($63,500 / $50,000 – 1)

  48. Sample Stop Loss Data Request • Description of Employer Group – name, address, # Ees, nature • Requested Stop Loss Contract – effective date, specific deductible, maximum limits, contract type (12/15), services to be covered (medical/Rx), coverage desired (specific & aggregate or spec only.) • Groups current coverage including in-force deductible, rates & factors, carrier and TPA name. • Large claim report with claims paid or pending in excess of 50% of specific deductible requested including diagnosis/prognosis. • 2-3 years first-dollar claim and enrollment history. • Current census listing of all participants under the plan. • Current plan document and schedule of benefits • Managed Care information including PPO network, utilization review, case management, disease management, etc.

  49. Websites to Know! • Self-Insurance Institute of America (www.SIIA.org) • Society of Professional Benefit Administrators (www.SPBATPA.org) • MyHealthGuide LLC (www.myhealthguide.com) • SOA Reinsurance Section Council (www.soa.org)

  50. What other medical reinsurance opportunities exist outside of commercial medical?

More Related