Traditional chinese social structure c 1949
1 / 26

Traditional Chinese Social Structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :

Traditional Chinese Social Structure, c. 1949. Land and labor Village and clan. Why was land reform such a crucial question for the revolutionaries?. Why was it so difficult?. Example: Gao village, (Hunan) 1949:. 280 mu (46 acres) for 20 households 1 landlord, 45 mu (7.4 ac.)

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Traditional Chinese Social Structure' - Jeffrey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Traditional chinese social structure c 1949 l.jpg

Traditional Chinese Social Structure, c. 1949

Land and labor

Village and clan

Why was land reform such a crucial question for the revolutionaries l.jpg

Why was land reform such a crucial question for the revolutionaries?

Why was it so difficult?

Example gao village hunan 1949 l.jpg
Example: Gao village, (Hunan) 1949: revolutionaries?

  • 280 mu (46 acres) for 20 households

  • 1 landlord, 45 mu (7.4 ac.)

  • 1 rich peasant, 33 mu (5.4 ac.)

  • Average middle peasant: 13.8 mu (2.3 ac.)

  • Average poor peasant: 6 mu (1 ac.)

Dig out the rotten root of feudalism l.jpg
“Dig out the rotten root of feudalism” revolutionaries?

  • Who depends upon whom for a living?

  • Why are the poor poor and the rich rich?

  • Should rent be paid to the landlords?

    (issues raised at organizing meetings for land reform; Hinton, 1966: 128)

Why were these questions so difficult l.jpg
Why were these questions so difficult? revolutionaries?

  • Land and labor linked to clan system

  • Clan structure shaped village life

  • Relative autonomy of clan/village created basis of solidarity vs. outsiders, other clans and villages

  • Religious ideology (esp. ancestor worship and Confucianism) supported clan structure

Clan power l.jpg
Clan power revolutionaries?

  • Small Gao village could unite with larger Gao village nearby

  • Within clan, dominant branch or family could control more land

  • “Feudal” exploitation obscured by religious ideology (Gao’s landlord taught Confucianism)

  • Dilemma for communists: how to weaken this structure while maintaining peasant support

The people s republic l.jpg

The People’s Republic revolutionaries?

“We have stood up.”

Mao Zedong to the Political Consultative Congress, Sept. 11, 1949

What was the structure of the new state l.jpg
What was the structure of the new state? revolutionaries?

  • “people’s democratic dictatorship”– (“New Democracy”)

  • Control of key industries (like social democracy-style socialism)

  • Democratic centralism in CCP

  • Democratic centralism in National People’s Congress

State structure l.jpg
State structure revolutionaries?

  • Party structure (Atlas, #21)

  • State structure (Atlas, #19)

State structure simplified by shafer l.jpg
State structure (simplified by Shafer) revolutionaries?

Chinese Communist Party

People’s Liberation Army

State Council

National Peoples Congress



People (in mass organizations, social institutions)

Cppcc org chart l.jpg
CPPCC org chart revolutionaries?

Cadre system l.jpg
Cadre system revolutionaries?

  • Inherited from Republic, which revised imperial structure

  • Li: “state technocrats” (37)

  • Even more power under Jiang Jieshi

  • Includes (Li: 48):

    • government officials

    • military officers

    • managers of state-owned or even large private corporations

    • intellectuals

Immediate tasks l.jpg
Immediate tasks: revolutionaries?

  • Land reform

  • Marriage law

  • “Resist America, Aid Korea”

  • Suppression of counterrevolutionaries

  • Thought reform

  • Three-Anti’s and Five-Anti’s (anti-corruption)

Why these campaigns l.jpg

Why these campaigns? revolutionaries?

How were they carried out?

What was the deep contradiction l.jpg
What was the “deep contradiction”? revolutionaries?

  • Dietrich: institutional development vs. revolutionary transformation

    • Bureaucracy vs. mass mobilization

    • Rationalization (development) vs. emotion (revolutionary romanticism)

  • Benson: nationalism and socialism

1953 stalin dies l.jpg
1953: Stalin dies revolutionaries?

Socialist transition first five year plan 1953 1957 l.jpg
Socialist transition: First Five-Year Plan (1953-1957) revolutionaries?

  • Bourgeois stage “abruptly terminated”? (Meisner, p. 108)

  • Soviet “aid”—with strings; loans with interest (Cf. Dietrich, p. 85, 87)

  • Negative lessons from USSR collectivization

  • Maoist “peasant socialism”: first, mutual aid teams, then “lower” Agricultural Producers Cooperatives (APCs), then…

First five year plan l.jpg
First five-year plan revolutionaries?

  • Soviet aid actually minimal; 3% of total investment

  • But “a drive based on the wholesale adoption of Stalinist methods” (Meisner: 109)

  • Growth impressive; 1952-57 18% rate higher than goal (14.7%) (Meisner: 112-113)

  • “a significant and stable modern industrial base” (ibid)

  • But social and economic costs to peasants

Contradictions in first five year plan l.jpg
Contradictions in First Five-Year Plan revolutionaries?

  • Two line struggle: Mao vs. “handwringers;” collectivization vs. “deep” private property concept; “old revolutionaries” vs. “new cadres”

  • “one-man management” vs. socialist “new man”

  • Bureaucratization vs. revolutionary transformation

  • Also reflected in education: “indoctrination” vs. bureaucratic elitism (examination system)

High tide l.jpg
High Tide revolutionaries?

  • 1955: caution prevails in Politburo, APCs dissolved

  • Mao goes to masses and lower levels, predicts “imminent” mass movement for socialism

  • Cadres investigate, enthusiastic villages held up as examples

Relations vs forces l.jpg
Relations vs. forces revolutionaries?

  • Mao: revolutionize relations of production first

  • Forces of production will follow

  • Opponents argue forces first

Base superstructure l.jpg
Base-Superstructure revolutionaries?


Ideas, ideology, institutions

Social reproduction

New superstructure

Class struggle


Social forces of production

Relations of production

Means of production

New forces of production

Socialist transition high tide l.jpg
Socialist transition: High Tide revolutionaries?

  • Campaign turns to industry; even more complete reorganization

  • By 1956, almost entire country in socialist transition

Socialist transition hundred flowers l.jpg
Socialist transition: Hundred Flowers revolutionaries?

  • Khruschev’s criticism of Stalin opens new possibilities in Third International

  • Mao, holding firmly to mass line, advocates “big democracy”—let one hundred flowers bloom

  • “On the correct handling..“

Why the hundred flowers campaign l.jpg
Why the hundred flowers campaign? revolutionaries?

  • “A vast and routinized bureaucratic apparatus…” (Meisner, 170)

  • Note the role of Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping in the Party at that moment

  • Who does Mao turn to, to counter that?

  • Contradiction between leadership and the led

  • Mao: “…question whether socialism or capitalism will win is still not settled.”

One hundred flowers l.jpg

One Hundred Flowers revolutionaries?

Who turned the flowers into poisonous weeds?