Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Personal Income Tax Reform: Consensus, Outliers, Specifics and the Longer-Term Socio-Economic Context. Dr Jeff Pope Tax Policy Research Unit, School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. Background. My interest/research in PIT reform started 2004
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Dr Jeff Pope
Tax Policy Research Unit,
School of Economics and Finance,
Curtin University, Perth, Australia
(but note Pope et al recommendation for SST abolition eventuated)
- taxpayer with complex affairs
- taxpayer with straight-forward affairs
- tax form returnee (who pays no tax)
In 2003-04 around 2.2 million personal taxpayers who lodged returns (20 %) did not pay any tax
(Based on 2001-02 figures; Pope, 2005)
Around 11 million PIT returns (over 50% of population!); operating costs around 5% of revenue; average PIT rate 23%!
‘Acid Test’: 75% of taxpayers use an agent, amongst the highest in the world!
Thresholds in real terms since 1978-79
eg same tax free threshold would be $13,549 in July 2003 in real terms
See Warren (2004) et al
See various reports, particularly those published by the Centre for Independent Studies, and generally supported to a lesser extent by reform consensus eg CPA Australia
Major trends discussed later
in terms of PIT revenue and as a percentage of PIT revenue:
i minor, or ‘tinkering and tokenism’: costing less than 5% of net (annual) tax revenue (less than $5 billion in 2003-04)
ii moderate: costing between 5% and up to 20% ($5 billion and $19 billion)
iii significant: costing 20% or more (more than $19 billion)
Removal of deductions including work-related deductions* $5 billion
GST increase (to 15%) $17 billion
*New Zealand abolished in 1989!
(In the short-term about even)
PIT reform debate has gender/equity issues
PIT reform needs to take account of falling real wages for some lower paid workers. Supports much higher tax-free threshold.
Supports proposal for GST rate increase
Politically difficult, with wide socio-economic complications if negative gearing abolished; keep status quo but improve ATO auditing