An integrated approach to diversity education intergroup dialogues and commonground
Download
1 / 42

An Integrated Approach to Diversity Education: Intergroup Dialogues and CommonGround - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 144 Views
  • Uploaded on

An Integrated Approach to Diversity Education: Intergroup Dialogues and CommonGround. Kelly E. Maxwell, Ph.D. Co-Director Roger Fisher, Co-Associate Director The Program on Intergroup Relations www.igr.umich.edu. National imperative on integrative learning.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'An Integrated Approach to Diversity Education: Intergroup Dialogues and CommonGround' - JasminFlorian


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
An integrated approach to diversity education intergroup dialogues and commonground l.jpg

An Integrated Approach to Diversity Education: Intergroup Dialogues and CommonGround

Kelly E. Maxwell, Ph.D. Co-Director

Roger Fisher, Co-Associate Director

The Program on Intergroup Relations

www.igr.umich.edu


National imperative on integrative learning l.jpg
National imperative on integrative learning Dialogues and CommonGround

“[I]ntegrative learning is a shorthand term for teaching a set of capacities—capacities we might also call the arts of connection, reflective judgment, and considered action—that enable graduates to put their knowledge to effective use. Thus defined, integrative learning may certainly include the various forms of interdisciplinary learning. But it should also lead students to connect and integrate the different parts of their overall education, to connect learning with the world beyond the academy, and, above all, to translate their education to new contexts, new problems, new responsibilities.”

“Collectively, the practices that foster integrative and culminating learning can help ensure that students will learn to take context and complexity into account when they apply their analytical skills to challenging problems.”

Carol Geary Schneider, ISSUES IN INTEGRATIVE STUDIES, No. 21, pp. 1-8 (2003).


The program on intergroup relations statement on integrative learning l.jpg
The Program on Intergroup Relations’ statement on integrative learning

More than multi disciplinary study or interdisciplinary study alone, IGR promotes integrative learning that is both interdisciplinary and life-wide learning in practice. Social Justice Education and Intergroup Relations are interdisciplinary fields of study requiring cognitive integration of concepts from several disciplines in an applied sense to complex social conditions. For example, students engaging in an examination of poverty may simultaneously apply concepts from economics, sociology, political science, public policy, social work and others during their work together.


Igr an integrative joint program l.jpg
IGR…an integrative joint-program integrative learning

In IGR, our goal is the integrative learning of our students in and out of the classroom that promotes their reflective judgment and their reflective practice. Our intentional structure as a joint program in the College of Literature, Science & the Arts (LS&A) and the Division of Student Affairs (DSA) lends itself to the drawing together of the interdisciplinarity of a liberal arts curriculum and the life-wide learning of student development theory and student self authorship.

Our courses and programs are designed to challenge students at every level to deepen their interdisciplinary knowledge and retrieve the knowledge they have gained during their lived experience (tacit knowledge). The desired outcome is students becoming actively engaged citizens with the ability to integrate their critical thinking, social critique and self awareness for participation in a diverse democracy and global economy.


Igr s mission to pursue social justice through education l.jpg
IGR’s MISSION: To Pursue Social Justice through Education integrative learning

  • As a joint venture of LSA and the Division of Student Affairs, IGR serves this mission by:

    --offering academic courses

    --facilitating co-curricular activities

    --conducting research

    --offering consultation and training, and

    --developing a Global Living-Learning Program

  • Through these activities, IGR provides opportunities for students, faculty, and staff to learn, cognitively and experientially, about issues of intergroup relations,

    --explicitly focusing on the relationships between social conflict and social justice.


The program on intergroup relations l.jpg
The Program on Intergroup Relations integrative learning

Theories of conflict and cognitive dissonance

  • Conflict between social groups is predictable, should not be repressed but should be expressed constructively.

  • Internal conflict when one’s values, beliefs and assumptions are challenged with new information.


The program on intergroup relations7 l.jpg
The Program on Intergroup Relations integrative learning

Contact theory

  • Intergroup Contact Increases Understanding

  • Important contact conditions

    • Equal Status

    • Sustained Personal Contact

    • Supported by Authorities


The program on intergroup relations8 l.jpg
The Program on Intergroup Relations integrative learning

Theories of “modern/aversive/symbolic” –isms

  • Paradox between attitudes and behaviors.

  • Conflict between conscious egalitarian values and less-conscious aversions


The program on intergroup relations9 l.jpg
The Program on Intergroup Relations integrative learning

Student Development Theory

  • Understanding the cognitive and emotional growth pathways to young adult development

  • Allowing students to participate as partners in learning


Cognitive and affective design l.jpg
Cognitive and Affective Design integrative learning

  • Low risk to high risk

  • Personal to institutional

  • Abstract to concrete

  • Knowledge/awareness to application


Tabletop l.jpg
Tabletop integrative learning

  • Discussion &

  • Worksheet


Video l.jpg
VIDEO integrative learning

  • Intergroup Dialogue Video


What is intergroup dialogue l.jpg
What is Intergroup Dialogue integrative learning?

  • Face-to-face meetings between members of two (or more) social groups that have a history of conflict or potential conflict.

  • The groups are broadly defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, ability, religion, socio-economic class and other social group identities.


Intergroup dialogue is l.jpg
Intergroup Dialogue is… integrative learning

  • A STRUCTURED (but flexible) process

  • SUSTAINED over an extended period of time

  • FACILITATED by persons extensively and specifically trained in Intergroup Dialogue methodology

    • At Michigan, we believe that facilitation is best provided by undergraduate peers.


In dialogue participants explore l.jpg
In Dialogue, Participants Explore… integrative learning

  • Commonalities and differences within and between groups

  • Differences in privilege and discrimination between groups

  • Intergroup conflicts, and positive uses of conflict

  • Possibilities for alliances and coalitions between groups, and other strategies for social justice


Major research questions l.jpg
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTIONS integrative learning

  • DOES INTERGROUP DIALOGUE

    • INCREASE INTERGROUP UNDERSTANDING, INTERGROUP RELATIONSHIPS, AND COMMITMENT TO INTERGROUP COLLABORATION?

  • HOW DOES INTERGROUP DIALOGUE PRODUCE EFFECTS?


What the study did l.jpg
WHAT THE STUDY DID integrative learning

  • RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TO DIALOGUES OR CONTROL GROUPS

  • USING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS

    • SURVEYS

    • INTERVIEWS

    • VIDEO TAPING

    • CONTENT ANALYZING FINAL PAPERS

  • ASSESSING STUDENTS

    • BEGINNING OF TERM, END OF TERM, A YEAR LATER


Participants in total study and intensive dialogue sub study l.jpg
PARTICIPANTS IN TOTAL STUDY AND INTENSIVE DIALOGUE SUB-STUDY integrative learning

52 Dialogue Experiments (26 race, 26 gender)

Dialogue Intensive Study (10 race, 10 gender dialogues)

Dialogue (n=726)

Dialogue Intensive Study (n=247)

Within Students of Color:

38% African American

36% Asian/Asian American

21% Latino/a

5% Other

Control (n=721)


Overall effects in three sets of outcomes l.jpg
OVERALL EFFECTS IN THREE SETS OF OUTCOMES integrative learning

Significant Effects of Dialogue

  • On 26 of 27 measures across intergroup understanding, intergroup relationships, and intergroup action

  • In both race and gender dialogues on 24 of 27 measures – on 3 significant effects only in race dialogues

  • For all 4 groups of students on 26 of 27 measures

  • Still evident a year later on 24 of 27 measures – smaller but still reliable.


Collaborative action l.jpg
COLLABORATIVE ACTION integrative learning

PRE to POST Effect of Dialogue

Time X Condition Interaction

F(1,1349) = 50.92, p < .001, η2 = .036

PRE to 1-YR LATER Effect of Dialogue

Time X Condition Interaction

F(1,1157) = 7.70, p = .006, η2 = .007

IGD

Months


What accounts for these effects learning l.jpg
WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR THESE EFFECTS? integrative learningLEARNING

STUDENTS IN DIALOGUE INCREASE MORE THAN CONTROL GROUPS IN:

  • ACTIVE THINKING

  • ENGAGED LEARNING

  • CONSIDERATION OF MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES

  • POSITIVE EMOTIONS IN INTERGROUP SETTINGS

  • POSITIVE INTERGROUP INTERACTIONS

  • IDENTITY ENGAGEMENT

    AND ALL OF THESE ARE FOSTERED BY COMMUNICATION PROCESSES…..

    AND THEN HELP ACCOUNT FOR IMPACT OF DIALOGUE ON THREE SETS OF OUTCOMES


What accounts for these effects communication processes l.jpg

Engaging Self integrative learning(α=.83)

Critical Reflection (α=.78)

“Examining the sources of my biases and assumptions.”

“Making Mistakes and reconsidering my opinions.”

“Thinking about issues that I may not have before.”

“Being able to disagree.”

“Sharing my views and experiences.”

“Asking questions that I felt I wasn’t able

to ask before.”

“Speaking openly without feeling judged.”

Learning from others (α=.86)

Alliance Building (α=.91)

“Hearing different points of view.”

“Learning from each other.”

“Hearing other students’ personal stories”

“Listening to other students’ commitment to work against injustices.”

“Talking about ways to take action on social issues.”

“Feeling a sense of hope about being able to challenge injustices.”

“Working through disagreements and conflicts.”

WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR THESE EFFECTS? COMMUNICATION PROCESSES


Relevance for all of us l.jpg
RELEVANCE FOR ALL OF US integrative learning

CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF….

  • STUDENTS GETTING TO KNOW EACH OTHER PERSONALLY & NON-SUPERFICIALLY ACROSS BACKGROUNDS & CULTURES

  • HELPING THEM UNDERSTAND INDIVIDUATION IS NOT ALL THERE IS – THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF CULTURE, GROUPS, INEQUALITIES IN SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE

  • CONNECTING SUBSTANTIVE & DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE TO THESE INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCIES


Tabletop24 l.jpg
Tabletop integrative learning

  • Discussion &

  • Worksheet


Video25 l.jpg
VIDEO integrative learning

  • CommonGround Video


Slide26 l.jpg

CommonGround integrative learning

History and Development

  • Response to student need for increased access to social justice education

  • Necessity to be congruent with departmental philosophy of education:

    • Peer-facilitation

    • Student-centered leadership

    • Mindfulness of power imbalances

    • Utilization of theory

    • Contributions to research


Slide27 l.jpg

History and Development integrative learning

Goals of CommonGround

  • Cultivate knowledge, insight, and awareness around social issues and intergroup relations

  • Provide an opportunity for students to talk about issues of identity, social issues, conflict and communication and to encourage further exploration

  • Recognize similarities and differences that exist both within groups and across identities

  • Foster reflection and discussion about individuals’ own identities and their intersectionality

  • Instill a capacity to continue involvements in social justice and/or social change after graduation


Commonground workshops l.jpg
CommonGround Workshops integrative learning

  • U-M student organizations, faculty, offices and programs request and engage in workshops

  • 1.5 - 3 hour time frame

  • Topics include: identity, privilege, oppression, civic engagement, etc.

  • Why Are All the ______ Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?; The Media: Seeing is Believing; Understanding the Campus Climate; Why Don’t You Understand Me?!


Structure of commonground l.jpg
Structure of CommonGround integrative learning

  • Workshop Facilitators

  • Student Leaders

  • Participants

  • Requestors


Utilization of self authorship intercultural maturity model l.jpg
Utilization of Self-Authorship & integrative learningIntercultural Maturity Model

Intercultural Maturity Model -

Patricia King & Marcia Baxter Magolda (2005)

  • Development of intercultural maturity as desired college outcome

  • 3 dimensions of framework:

    • Intrapersonal

    • Interpersonal

    • Cognitive

  • Theory to Practice

    Self-Authorship Model

    Robert Keagan (1994)

  • Students who interpret and learn from experiences on their own engage in a mode of meaning making, called “self-authorship”



Outcomes based research l.jpg
Outcomes-Based Research integrative learning

  • Methods

    • Student Voice

    • Surveys

    • Focus Groups

    • 1:1 Interviews

    • Emails

  • Qualitative and Quantitative


Evaluation and assessment the trajectory l.jpg
Evaluation and Assessment ~ The Trajectory integrative learning

  • Pilot: Winter 2007 – August 2007

    • Participant Evaluation

    • Validation of CommonGround

  • Year One: Fall 2007 – Summer 2008

    • Reevaluated Participant Evaluation

    • Workshop Facilitator Reflections

    • Preliminary use of theory in research and assessment

  • Year Two: Fall 2008 – Summer 2009

    • Incorporated Intercultural Maturity, Self-Authorship as guiding forces for research interpretation. Did very limited quantitative research on facilitator impact.

    • Began the process of developing Learning Outcomes and Research Structure

    • Developed Logic Model for CommonGround

  • Year Three: Fall 2009 – Present

    • Structured and Formalized Research Project

    • Solidified Learning Goals and research Questions

    • Obtained IRB

    • Conducted Workshop facilitator focus group and analysis of transcripts.


Slide34 l.jpg

Preliminary Research integrative learning

  • Goal: Cultivate knowledge, insight, and awareness around social issues and intergroup relations

  • Facilitator: “I think my experience here also let me know about America in terms of ….social identity, so I can share with other international students to let them know more about these issues in the United States”


Slide35 l.jpg

Preliminary Research integrative learning

  • Goal: Foster reflection and discussion about individuals’ own identities and their intersectionality

  • “…CommonGround has helped me to

    conceptualize a lot of my thoughts on

    social identity into more concrete terms.

    It has also helped me make sense of a

    lot of my realities and in doing so, has

    also helped me to externalize the issues

    I need to externalize. I have for too

    long thought that I was to blame for

    the things that have happened in my

    life, but am now able to see the role

    that my social identities play in my

    everyday realities.” – Facilitator

  • Some of what I discovered about myself

    was a surprise, and very helpful for how

    I see myself - Participant


Slide36 l.jpg

Preliminary Research integrative learning

  • Goal: Instill a capacity to continue involvements in social justice and/or social change after graduation

  • “I am currently in the Political Science stream, but because of this experience, I am considering pursuing a career that will allow to not only continue using my facilitation skills, but also one that will ultimately involves me pursuing a social justice issue.” --Facilitator


Commonground facilitator evaluation research questions l.jpg
CommonGround Facilitator Evaluation Research Questions integrative learning

  • What effect does Common Ground have on learning about:

    • Social justice concepts

    • Facilitation

  • What effect does CommonGround have on student learning about:

    • Values and social identity

    • Interpersonal relationships in different settings

    • Conflict across social identities

  • How are facilitators integrating what they learn from CommonGround and applying it to their classes, personal lives and other activities?


Focus group preliminary results themes l.jpg
Focus Group Preliminary Results integrative learningThemes

  • Expansion of knowledge and depth on social justice issues

    • Facilitator #1: “This program has expanded my ideas and my passion for social justice.”*

  • Greater awareness of own social identities

    • Facilitator #2: “I actually joined CommonGround because I feel like an agent (in) pretty much all (of) my identities. And one thing that was interesting for me was learning more about my target identity.”

  • Supportive Environment and Family Atmosphere

    • Facilitator #3: “I’ve never been more affirmed by a group of people in my entire life.”

*Names of participants were changed to respect and protect their confidentiality.


Focus group preliminary results themes39 l.jpg
Focus Group Preliminary Results integrative learningThemes

  • Feeling of burden from all the social injustices

    • Facilitator #1: “A lot of things that were brought up while I facilitated around inequalities was more than just addressing (inappropriate) language, but more so… taking action systematically. I haven’t been able to find that.”

  • Greater confidence understanding social identities in facilitation

    • Facilitator #2: “I think my experience here also let me know about America in terms of ….social identity, so I can share with other international students to let them know more about these issues in the United States”


Tabletop40 l.jpg
Tabletop integrative learning

  • Discussion &

  • Worksheet


Mportfolio umich edu l.jpg
Mportfolio.umich.edu integrative learning

Mportfolio, an integrative learning tool, incorporates the following unique components:

  • Valuing Learning From All Aspects of LifeHelp students identify learning from all areas of their life, bridge their college experiences to other life experiences, and demonstrate how their underlying values and beliefs connect to their learning

  • Documenting Learning Beyond GraduationDevelop students' abilities to recognize "a-ha" moments in their lives and encourage them to document their knowledge, skills, and contributions beyond graduation

  • Understanding What We Know, Value, and BelieveRetrieving, reflecting, integrating, and documenting knowledge that has been gained through experience and connecting that knowledge to values, beliefs, and decision making

  • Supporting Assessment and AccountabilityStudents reflect on their learning, recognize how that learning relates to competencies, and demonstrate how those competencies inform their practice


Invitation to our national intergroup dialogue institute l.jpg
Invitation to our National Intergroup Dialogue Institute integrative learning

The Program on Intergroup Relations hosts annual Intergroup Dialogue National Institutes for faculty and staff who wish to learn our philosophy and techniques for the purpose of creating dialogue programs on their own campuses.

  • The next National Institute will be held June 8-11, 2011 in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Join us in learning about intergroup dialogue and how you might use it at your institution!

    • Participate in engaging activities commonly used in intergroup dialogue settings

    • Explore the overall dialogue framework and The Michigan Model

    • Strategize the development and support of academic and co-curricular programs

  • http://www.igr.umich.edu/about/institute


ad