A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization
Download
1 / 12

a qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 310 Views
  • Uploaded on

A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization. Lau, V. C. S., Au W.T., & Ho, J. M. C. (2003). Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 73-99. A Critique by Ozgun B. Rodopman. Construct of interest. Counterproductive work behavior (CBP)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'a qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization ' - JasminFlorian


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization

A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organization

Lau, V. C. S., Au W.T., & Ho, J. M. C. (2003). Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 73-99.

A Critique by Ozgun B. Rodopman


Construct of interest
Construct of interest counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Counterproductive work behavior (CBP)

    Any voluntary organizational behaviors that affect an individual’s job performance or undermine organizational effectiveness

  • CBP is costly for the organization and for the individual

    • Financial losses, sabotage, health costs, lower productivity, lower performance ratings


Research question
Research Question counterproductive behavior in organization

  • What are the antecedents of counterproductive work behaviors?

  • Inconsistent findings in individual studies regarding the antecedents of CBP

  • No meta-analysis on CBP before


Difficulties in meta analysis on cpb
Difficulties in Meta-analysis on CPB counterproductive behavior in organization

  • No consensus on the definition

  • No agreement on which behaviors are considered counterproductive work behavior

  • Not enough studies


Review framework
Review Framework counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Framework by Martinko, Grundlach and Douglas (2002)

    • 1. Personal factors (e.g., job satisfaction)

    • 2. Organizational factors (e.g, group influence)

    • 3. Work factors (e.g., job complexity)

    • 4. Contextual factors (e.g., employment rate)

  • No mention of leading models counterproductive work behavior and related measures or studies


Review plan
Review Plan counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Criteria

    • Theft, production deviance, lateness, absenteeism and alcohol abuse

    • Not representative of the construct domain

    • Absenteeism and alcohol are not considered as counterproductive work behavior in the mainstream CWB studies

  • Predictor

    • Age, sex, marital status, tenure, income, educational level, race, job satisfaction and job satisfaction related symptoms

      • Personality is left out ?

      • Stressors are combined under job satisfaction related symptoms ?


Procedure
Procedure counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Literature search

    • PsycINFO (1967-2001)

    • Published studies and unpublished dissertations

  • Inclusion criteria

    • Target: Employed adults

    • Withdrawal, intentions of turnover and retirement are excluded

    • 40 independent samples (total N= 42,359)

  • kslk


Analyses
Analyses counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Correlations

  • Hunter & Schmidt metaanalytic method

  • Correction for sampling error and unreliability in both the predictor and the criterion

  • Estimation for the missing reliabilities

  • No information regarding the rating process, raters or inter-rater reliability ?

  • Combination of all criteria (CBP general) used to for some analysis ?


Results
Results counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Age and job satisfaction are antecedents of counterproductive work behavior.

  • Absenteeism is more prevalent among employees who are young, female, have lower income, have lower job satisfaction, and who perceive a stronger absence norm, or stronger ability to be on time.


Conclusion
Conclusion counterproductive behavior in organization

  • Not representative of the construct domain from the theoretical perspective

    • The main CWB studies are not included

    • Key variables such as personality are excluded without sufficient explanation

  • Problematic from a methodological standpoint

    • Sample size is too small (lowest 2- highest 18)

    • Not enough power

    • Combination all criteria as one ‘CPB general’ construct


ad