problem solving
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Problem Solving

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Problem Solving - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 369 Views
  • Uploaded on

Problem Solving Views of Problem solving Well-defined problems Much studied in AI Requires search Domain general heuristics for solving problems What about ill-defined problems? No real mechanisms for dealing with these

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Problem Solving' - Gideon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
views of problem solving
Views of Problem solving
  • Well-defined problems
    • Much studied in AI
    • Requires search
    • Domain general heuristics for solving problems
  • What about ill-defined problems?
    • No real mechanisms for dealing with these
    • The problem may be solved suddenly by ‘seeing’ the problem differently
    • Often requires developing a suitable representation
problem solving as search
Problem solving as search

INITIAL STATE

GOAL STATE

INITIAL STATE

GOAL STATE

?

Play the game: http://www.mazeworks.com/hanoi/

solving most games involves search
Solving most games involves search
  • Examples:
    • Cannibals and missionaries:http://www.learn4good.com/games/puzzle/boat.htm
    • Theseus and the Minotaur:http://www.logicmazes.com/theseus.html
    • More special mazeshttp://www.logicmazes.com/
search spaces can be large
Search spaces can be large

#DISCS #STATES

3 33 = 27

4 34 = 81

5 35 = 243

6 36 = 729

what if the search space is too large
What if the search space is too large?
  • It is not possible to enumerate the entire search space for many well-defined problems.
  • We must use heuristics
    • Not guaranteed to work but easy to implement
    • Example heuristics
      • Trial and error
      • Hill climbing
      • Means-end analysis
trial and error
Edward L. Thorndike (1874-1949) found that many animals search by trial and error

(aka random search)

Found that cats in a “puzzle box” (see left) initially behaved impulsively and apparently random.

After many trials in puzzle box, solution time decreases.

Trial and Error

In order to escape the animal has to perform three different actions: press a pedal, pull on a string, and push a bar up or down

hill climbing
Hill Climbing
  • Find some measure of the distance between your present state and the end state.
    • Take a step in the direction that most reduces that distance
getting stuck in a suboptimal solution
Getting stuck in a suboptimal solution

According to the hill-climbing strategy, at each step, you choose a path that moves you closer to the goal. This strategy can fail when steps are required that initially will move away from the goal

means end analysis
Means-end analysis
  • Try to reduce the largest difference between the initial state and the goal state first.
  • That creates new sub-problems
  • Each of these new sub-problems needs to be solved.
setting subgoals in means end analysis
Setting subgoals in means-end analysis
  • Painting your house (GOAL 1)
  • Apply paint (SUBGOAL 2)
  • Need paint and brush (SUBGOAL 3)
  • Go to hardware store (SUBGOAL 4)
  • Went to hardware store (SUBGOAL 4)
  • Got paint and brush (SUBGOAL 3)
  • Apply paint (SUBGOAL 2)
  • Paint the house (GOAL 1)
what about ill defined problems
What about ill-defined problems?
  • No real mechanisms for dealing with these
  • According to Gestalt psychologists, the problem may be solved suddenly by ‘seeing’ the problem differently
  • Often requires developing a suitable representation
six stick problem

Wrong solution:

With these six sticks:

Answer:

Make four of these:

Six stick problem
kohler 1945 monkey and banana problem
Kohler (1945): monkey and banana problem.

Kohler observed that chimpanzees appeared to have an insight into the problem before solving it

functional fixedness
Functional Fixedness

Maier’s (1931) two-string problem

why people get stuck solving problems
Why people get stuck solving problems
  • Functional Fixedness
    • Subjects who utilize an object for a particular function will have more trouble in a problem-solving situation that requires a new and dissimilar function for the object.
    • Young children suffer less from functional fixedness

 Less experience might help...

developing expertise
Developing Expertise
  • What are differences between novices and experts?
  • How to become an expert?
  • Speed of learning
see anything unusual
See anything unusual?

(collapse of the upper right lobe, upper left in picture)

(normal)

  • Experts need only a few seconds to see what is wrong (or what isn’t)
  • Experts perceive large meaningful patterns in their domain
chess studies
Chess Studies
  • De Groot (1965)
  • Instructed 5 chess grandmasters to think out loud
  • Grandmasters only considered about 30 moves and only thought 6 moves ahead.
  • Not that different from novices. However, The 30 moves considered by a grandmaster are really good moves
  • Masters rely on extensive experience: 50,000 patterns
number of pieces successfully recalled by chess players after the first study of a chess board
Number of pieces successfully recalled by chess players after the first study of a chess board.

(Chase & Simon, 1973)

conclusion from chase simon 1973
Conclusion from Chase & Simon (1973)
  • Chess masters only expert with real chess positions. They do not have better memory in general
  • Expertise allows chunking of salient information to promote memory of good moves
  • Experts organize knowledge differently – reflects a deep understanding.
experts see and represent a problem in their own domain at a deeper level than novices
Experts see and represent a problem in their own domain at a deeper level than novices…
  • Experts see structural similarities
  • Novices see surface similarity

(Chi, Glaser, and Farr, 1988)

slide27

Novices group these

Experts group these

Chi, Feltovich, and Glaser, 1981)

what makes an expert an expert
What makes an expert an expert?
  • Talent? IQ? Practice? Genetic factors?
  • Experts are masters mostly in their own domain; the skill does not cross into different domains
  • Study exceptional feats:
    • Memory experts
    • Chess experts
    • Musicians
    • Athletes

(Voss et al., 1983)

general inherited factors
General & Inherited Factors

IQ tests*

Short-term memory

Speed of reading

Reasoning ability

Attention

Do not predict

superior performance in a particular domain

Experts are not better problem solvers in general. Expertise is domain specific

* IQ tests might predict some success in high-complexity jobs (e.g. scientist)

10 year rule
10 year rule
  • 10 years of deliberate practice needed to attain an international level
  • Deliberate practice: practice that is highly motivated and involves careful self-monitoring
  • Master chess players spend 10,000 – 20,000 hours playing
what about talent
What about talent?
  • Maybe exceptional performance in some area can be explained by talent – an innate predisposition that predetermines performance in a domain.
  • Anders Ericsson et al.

 disagree that concept of talent is useful or explains anything (genius is 90% perspiration and 10% inspiration)

 this is controversial!

what about musical talent
What about musical talent?
  • Absolute pitch:
    • Most musicians acquired it for their own instruments
    • Can be improved by training
difference between good and exceptional musicians is related to the amount of practice
Difference between good and exceptional musicians is related to the amount of practice

Graph from Ericsson et al. (1996) showing the cumulative amount of practice by two groups of aspiring musical performers (experts and good violinists) and those who planned to teach music

ad