The effects of gaming on the confederated tribes of siletz indians
Download
1 / 10

The Effects of Gaming - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 720 Views
  • Updated On :

The Effects of Gaming on the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians The Tribe Reservation: 3,666 acres Members: approximately 3,000 people Today’s Location: Lincoln City, Oregon Original Location: Coastal region of Northern CA.- Southwestern WA. Tribes Bands Alsea Chasta Scoton Coos

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The Effects of Gaming' - Gabriel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The tribe l.jpg
The Tribe Indians

  • Reservation: 3,666 acres

  • Members: approximately 3,000 people

  • Today’s Location: Lincoln City, Oregon

  • Original Location: Coastal region of Northern CA.- Southwestern WA.


Tribes l.jpg
Tribes Indians

Bands

  • Alsea

  • Chasta Scoton

  • Coos

  • Coquille

  • Chetco

  • Nestucca

  • Rogue River (Takelma)

  • Port Orford

  • Shasta

  • Siuslaw

  • Tillamook

  • Tututni

  • Umpqua

  • Yaquina

  • Cow Creek

  • Joshua

  • Galice Creek

  • Flores Creek

  • Euchee

  • Applegate

  • Nehalem

  • Siletz

  • Chasta Costa

  • Sixes

  • Nolthatnah

  • Mac-en-noot-e-way

  • Delwashe

  • Pistol River


Slide4 l.jpg

Note: The Tillamook, Nestucca and Yaquina tribes were assigned to the agency, no data available

Table 1. Census Report of Siletz 1865 (redrawn from Kent 1977:47)


Timeline l.jpg
Timeline assigned to the agency, no data available

  • Established in 1855

  • Terminated in 1956

  • Regained Federal Recognition in 1977

  • Gained the Right to Self Govern in 1992

  • Opened the Chinook Winds Casino in 1995


Native gaming l.jpg
Native Gaming assigned to the agency, no data available

  • Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA)- 1988

  • This act “gives tribes the exclusive right to regulate gaming on Indian lands within the states that do not prohibit such gaming as a matter of criminal law or public policy” (Hick 2006:110).


Uses of funds l.jpg
Uses of Funds assigned to the agency, no data available

  • Fund tribal government operations or programs

  • Provide for the general welfare of the Indian tribe and its members

  • Promote tribal economic development,

  • Donate to charitable organizations, or

  • Help fund operations of local government agencies


Crime rate change in oregon and lincoln city l.jpg
Crime Rate Change in Oregon and Lincoln City assigned to the agency, no data available

Table 2. Crime Rate Change in Oregon and Lincoln City (redrawn from ECONorthwest 1999: 27)


Benefits of gaming l.jpg
Benefits of Gaming assigned to the agency, no data available

Table 2. Tribal Expenditures on Non-Gaming Activities-1998 (redrawn from ECONorthwest 1999:4)


References l.jpg
References assigned to the agency, no data available

  • California State University San Marcos

  • 2008 A Brief Interpretive History of the Rogue River War and the Coast, Alsea, and Siletz Reservations to 1894. Electronic document, http://www.csusm.edu/nadp/subject.htm, accessed on March 2.

  • Confederated Tribes of Siletz

  • 2008 History and Culture. Electronic Document, http://ctsi.nsn.us/History_and_Culture.html, accessed February 20.

  • Culin, Stewart

  • 1992 Games of the North American Indians Vol. 1: Games of Chance. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Cushman, Candi

  • 2007 Indian Gaming Hurts Tribes. In Opposing Viewpoints: Gambling. David Haugen and Susan Musser, eds. Pp. 54-62. CA: Thomson Gale.

  • Economics Resource Group

  • 2002 Indian Gaming Benefits Native Americans. In Opposing View Points: Gambling. James D. Torr ed. Pp. 116-122. CA: Thomson Gale.

  • ECONorthwest

  • 1999 An Economic and Social Impact Study. A Report for the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, 1-40. Portland: ECONorthwest.

  • Hick, Carter W.

  • 2006 The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act: Why Tribes Can Build Casinos Off the Reservation. Gaming Law Review 10 (2) 110-123.

  • Kalugin, Marya and Tammy Bick

  • 2008 Confederated Tribes of Siletz History, tradition and Culture. Electronic document, http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/soc204/plazad/native2/marya/marya.htm, accessed March 2.

  • Kent, William Eugene

  • 1977 The Siletz Indian Reservation 1855-1900. Newport, Oregon: Lincoln County Historical Society.

  • Napoli, Maria

  • 2002 Native Wellness for the New Millennium: the Impact of Gaming. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 29 (1) 17-34.

  • National Indian Gaming Association

  • 2007 Indian Gaming Facts. Electronic document, http://www.indiangaming.org/library/indian-gaming-facts/index.shtml, accessed on March 2.

  • Pace, David

  • 2002 Indian Gaming Does Not Benefit Most Native Americans. . In Opposing View Points: Gambling. James D. Torr ed. Pp. 123-127. CA: Thomson Gale.

  • Palermo, Dave

  • 2007 Indian Gaming Benefits Tribes. In Opposing Viewpoints: Gambling. David Haugen and Susan Musser, eds. Pp. 47-53. MI: Thomson Gale.

  • U.S. Department of the Interior

  • 2003 American Indian Population and Labor Force Report. Report, i-24. Bureau of Indian Affairs: Office of Tribal Services.


ad