New ideas for space exploration center for space nuclear research csnr l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 40

New Ideas for Space Exploration: Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR) PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Ideas for Space Exploration: Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR) Dr. Steven D. Howe 9/04/09 Current NASA Plan: Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) Design and build Ares-I- solid rocket 1 st stage, Lox/Lh2 second stage – both are new systems

Related searches for New Ideas for Space Exploration: Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR)

Download Presentation

New Ideas for Space Exploration: Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


New ideas for space exploration center for space nuclear research csnr l.jpg

New Ideas for Space Exploration:Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR)

Dr. Steven D. Howe

9/04/09


Current nasa plan exploration systems architecture study esas l.jpg

Current NASA Plan: Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS)

  • Design and build Ares-I- solid rocket 1st stage, Lox/Lh2 second stage – both are new systems

  • Ares-I takes humans to orbit in the ORION (upgraded Apollo) capsule

  • Ares V is a heavy lift vehicle – 125 T to LEO

  • Start Lunar sorties (~10) by 2018

  • Establish a lunar Outpost around 2020

  • Mars in 2030


Lunar trajectory objectives l.jpg

Lunar Trajectory Objectives

  • Minimum ΔV trajectory

  • Time-of-Flight (TOF) is not a significant concern.

  • Insertion into either equatorial or polar LLO

Lunar Orbit

Capture (LOC)

Low Earth Orbit (LEO)

Trans-Lunar

Orbit (TLO)

Earth

Moon

Low Lunar Orbit (LLO)

Trans Lunar

Injection (TLI)


Csnr perspective l.jpg

CSNR Perspective

  • Goal of space exploration is understanding our “neighborhood”, i.e. the solar system

    • Unmanned scientific missions for science and as a precursor to human missions

    • Ultimate goal is the expansion of human civilization throughout the solar system


Csnr perspective5 l.jpg

CSNR Perspective

Current propulsion technologies are insufficient for human expansion past the Moon

we need the “steamship” equivalent to the sailing ships of the past

what is the next propulsion technology - fission, fusion, electric propulsion, sails, beams?

According to the Independent Review Panel convened in 1999 to review the propulsion technologies examined in the NASA Advanced Space Transportation Program:

“The Review Team categorized fission as the only technology of those presented [45 concepts were presented] which is applicable to human exploration of the near planets in the near to mid-term time frame…”

The CSNR proposes that the Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) is the only near term option for improved transportation of humans to other planets


Benefits of the ntr have been shown for several missions l.jpg

Benefits of the NTR have been shown for several missions

  • Moon - Reduce costs of implementing a Lunar Outpost

  • Mars - Faster missions for humans; reduced radiation exposure; lower costs for cargo; adaptability to hazards

  • Good Asteroid - rendezvous

  • Bad Asteroid/comet - rapid interception

  • Outer solar system – time to “first science” within a decade for orbitor missions to outer planets and to Kuiper Belt fly-through

In short, the NTR opens up access to the entire solar system for humans and robotic probes


Nuclear technologies in space l.jpg

Nuclear Technologies in Space

  • Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTG)

  • Fission Surface Power (FSP)

  • Nuclear Thermal Rockets (NTR)


The csnr is pursing a common technology for reactor fuels and radioisotope sources l.jpg

The CSNR is pursing a Common Technology for reactor fuels and radioisotope sources

The distribution and encapsulation of radioisotope materials and nuclear fuels in an inert carrier matrix will address several issues and requirements for space power applications:

Potential to address non-proliferation security requirements.

The ability to survive re-entry into Earth’s atmosphere and impact under accident conditions.

Assembly & handling safety

Reduction in material self interaction such as -n reactions.

Self-shielding properties.

The SPS acquired with a INL LDRD grant enables fabrication of tungsten parts at nearly full theoretical density


Status of radioisotope power l.jpg

Status of Radioisotope Power

In 2007, DOE will purchase the last 10 kg of Pu-238 from Russia (ref- Robert Lange, DOE/NE,ANS Space Nuclear Conference, June, 2007)

Total of 24 kg will be in the US inventory

Four Flagship missions are currently in pre-design which may consume most, if not all, of the PU-238 available to NASA

NASA recently called for proposals for Discovery class missions that would use Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generators (ASRGs)

Without a restart of Pu-238 production in the US, no missions will go beyond Mars after ~2017

However, over 1800 other radioisotopes exist that might be applicable to exploration missions


Csnr examination of radioisotope power and propulsion l.jpg

CSNR examination of radioisotope power and propulsion

  • Radioisotopes can have 100,000 times the energy density as current batteries

  • Examined the use of alternative isotopes

    • Shorter half lives

    • Higher power density

  • Examined new encapsulation techniques


Slide11 l.jpg

1.2 Isotope Preliminary Selection:


Slide12 l.jpg

Radio-Isotope Heated Jet Engines for Titan Flight Applications

  • Utilize radioisotope heat sources to power Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    • NASA:

      • ENABLES detailed, high resolution mapping of the surface of planets and moons with non-oxygen atmospheres

    • DOD/ DHS application and interest:

      • May enable detailed mapping of the Earth’s ocean bottom

      • May allow long duration observation of borders or hostile territory

Image courtesy of http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/events/titana/index.cfm


Slide13 l.jpg

Operation Basics

  • Replace combustion chamber in jet engines with a radioisotope driven heat exchanger

  • Operates for months to years based on isotope selection

  • Somewhat throttled

  • Utilizes ~95% of heat generated

  • Stable, robust, long-lived

Image courtesy of http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/events/titana/index.cfm


Titan flight conditions l.jpg

Titan Flight Conditions

  • 200 kg craft

  • P=1.6 bar; ρ=5.7kg/m3

  • Flight Velocity of 20 to 50 mph

  • Lift to drag ratio of 12

  • CL of 0.63

  • Required thrust of 8 lbf

  • Wing planform area of ~10 ft2

Image courtesy of http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/events/titana/index.cfm


Unmanned underwater vehicle for us port security l.jpg

Unmanned Underwater Vehicle for US Port Security

  • Concept of Operations

    • Scan ships of interest to determine the existence of special nuclear material

    • Acquire, track, follow, and report the location of ships of interest

    • Operate without being detected

  • Outfitted with SNM detection equipment

    • Close proximity maneuvering near ships

    • 15-20 knots operation speed

    • 5-Year mission durations


Fission surface power fsp l.jpg

NASA’s FSP program seeks to design and build an “affordable reactor”

UO2 fuel,

stainless steel clad,

NaK coolant

Most of the mass is in the radiators

Shield mass depends on distance and burial option

Estimated cost is $1.8B

Fission Surface Power (FSP)


Csnr alternative mobile nuclear powered base l.jpg

CSNR alternative:Mobile Nuclear Powered Base


Slide18 l.jpg

Project Description

  • NASA’s current plan is the US Space Exploration Policy (was Vision for Space Exploration)

  • Return humans to the Moon and then to Mars

  • The current plan allows for 5-10 Sorties:

    • Placing a few humans on the lunar surface for 2 weeks at different locations

    • Then placing a lunar outpost somewhere that houses 6 humans for 6 weeks


Slide19 l.jpg

Project Description, cont.

  • Included is a rover that will allow astronauts to travel 300 km in 3 days

    • Estimated power ~2kWe

    • Unshielded against lethal solar flares

  • Adding shielding against solar flares adds ~2 tons

    • Required power ~10-20kWe

  • A completely mobile base would:

    • Reduce number of costly sorties

    • Allow long stay times

    • Provide shielding from lethal solar flares


Slide20 l.jpg

Mobility Options – “Wagon”

  • Habitation Modules

  • Radiator/Storage Carts

  • Reactor Cart

Reactor at Full Power In Transit


Slide21 l.jpg

360° Radial Shields


Slide22 l.jpg

Smart Shields


Csnr alternative optically coupled lunar reactor l.jpg

CSNR Alternative:Optically Coupled Lunar Reactor

  • Utilize the tungsten based technology

  • Free standing uranium loaded tungsten core

  • Hard vacuum in a totally reflective cylinder

  • Reflect all light to PV array at base

  • Advantages

    • Power conversion unit can be repaired

    • Beam power to factory

    • Use process heat

    • Light weight option allows “landed reactor”


Slide24 l.jpg

Mass Comparison

  • Mass comparison between Optical System and the FSP.

  • Is it feasible?

  • Yes, under these conditions:

  • Thermophotovoltaic Cells efficiency is increased.

  • The reflector design can be advanced so more than 50% of the radiation exit after one reflection.


Nuclear thermal rockets ntr offer 2x the performance of the shuttle engines l.jpg

Nuclear Thermal Rockets (NTR) offer 2x the performance of the Shuttle engines


Recent developments in nasa for nuclear thermal propulsion ntp l.jpg

Recent developments in NASA for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP)

NASA’s Mars Architecture Study (Dec 2007) concluded that the NTR was required for human missions to Mars

National Research Council committee (S. Howe served as one of 23 members) that reviewed the NASA Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP) just reported (8/21/08) that the one technical gap in program was no funding for the NTR.


Issues l.jpg

Issues

  • Ensuring no emission of Radioactive exhaust

  • Ensuring difficulty of extracting fuel

  • Ground testing

  • Operations in space- restart

  • Reliability – space cold

  • Cost

Tungsten based fuel may solve 1, 2 and 3

Supplying the Lunar Base would address 4, 5 and 6


Ntr based esas architecture l.jpg

NTR-Based ESAS Architecture

EDS

NTR


Tungsten cermet fuels l.jpg

Tungsten Cermet Fuels

  • Hot hydrogen compatibility

  • Better thermal conductivity

  • Potential for long life reactors

    • High melting point (~3700 K)

    • Resistance to creep at high temperatures

  • Smaller reactor core then carbide fuels

  • Good radiation migration properties

  • Contains fission products and uranium oxide in fuel

  • More radiation resistant than carbon


Ntr based esas architecture30 l.jpg

NTR-Based ESAS Architecture


Near earth objects neo l.jpg

Near Earth Objects (NEO)

08/03/2009

31


Problem statement l.jpg

Problem Statement

  • Long-period comet, traveling towards Earth with nearly linear trajectory across solar system

    • Approximation of worst-case scenario

  • Diameter ~10 km, mass ~3e+14 kg as initial definition

  • Comet initially observed at ~5 AU (1 AU = 1.49e+8 km) around Jupiter orbit traveling ~18 km/s and gradually accelerating as approaching earth

    • Parabolic trajectory

  • Approximate impact time is ~ 297 days ~ 10 months

08/03/2009

32


Our approach l.jpg

Our Approach

  • Multiple NTRs (Nuclear Thermal Rocket) launched from LEO

    • Rockets carry thermonuclear devices (~9 Mt)

    • Mission design:

    • Determine NTR trajectory (independent of scale)

    • Estimate terminal interception yield needed per mass of comet

    • Conclude feasible problem scale based on constraints (current launch capacity, available warhead yield, etc.)

08/03/2009

33


Trajectory l.jpg

Trajectory

08/03/2009

35


Chemical rocket mass to leo vs time of intercept l.jpg

Chemical Rocket Mass to LEO vs. Time of Intercept

08/03/2009


Csnr summer fellowships program has proven the ability to attract top students l.jpg

CSNR Summer Fellowships program has proven the ability to attract top students

4 years running

Nationwide search

Accept applications for 2 months

Unique research projects each year

Goals

Provide Student Fellows an in-depth understanding of nuclear reactor and radioisotope power and heating technologies applied to space exploration

Gain experience using complex computer codes that will be applicable to modeling nuclear systems

Speaking and writing experience (weekly presentations by students)

Exposure to INL and Idaho Falls

Produce sufficient information for production of unsolicited proposals to federal agencies

Provide pool to fill “Next Degree” opportunities

Identify good fits to INL and not-so-good fits


2009 csnr summer fellowships l.jpg

2009 CSNR Summer Fellowships

Funded by a combination of

NASA - $100K

CAES program development - $25K

INL NGNP program – $25K

105 applications – due to USRA broadcast to members

Accepted 14 Fellows represent 10 states and 12 universities

4 PhD candidates, 9 MS, 1 undergraduate, 1 DoE intern

Disciplines

5 Nuclear eng.,

4 mechanical eng.,

2 physics,

1 aerospace eng., 1 chemical eng., and 1 computer science

Working on “challenging” topics attracts the students

Mobile lunar base, nuclear rockets, decoupled fast reactors, isotope powered UAVs and UUVs, “smart” shields, comet interceptors, Mars Hopper


Next degree nxd program objectives l.jpg

Next Degree (NxD) Program Objectives

Build technical workforce in the CSNR and provide a feedstream into INL

Difficult to develop projects in CSNR without feasibility studies

Hard to do feasibility studies using INL staff without funding

Shortage of NE graduates- getting worse

Students are tempted to leave early for a paycheck

Desire is to attract top quality students from around the country to INL/CSNR by engaging them in space exploration projects

Many students do not automatically see INL and Idaho as a premier research location

NxD students work ½ time at industry competitive salary on CSNR or INL project and ½ time on their next degree

Able to retain school affiliation or enroll in Idaho Universities

Number of NxD students increased to 7 in FY09

3 PhD and 4 MS


Further contact l.jpg

Further contact

Center for Space Nuclear Research

www.csnr.usra.edu

Universities Space Research Association (USRA)

www.usra.edu

Idaho National Laboratory

www.inl.gov

Dr. Steven D. Howe

[email protected]


  • Login