Projects and programs that have been managed for results timor leste experience
Download
1 / 11

Projects and Programs that have been Managed for Results Timor-Leste Experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


Projects and Programs that have been Managed for Results Timor-Leste Experience. Emilia Pires Advisor on Development Planning and External Coordination 05 Feb 04. Background: 1999 crisis. 25 years of occupation Vote for independence August 1999

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Projects and Programs that have been Managed for Results Timor-Leste Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Projects and Programs that have been Managed for ResultsTimor-Leste Experience

Emilia Pires

Advisor on Development Planning and External Coordination

05 Feb 04


Background: 1999 crisis

  • 25 years of occupation

  • Vote for independence August 1999

  • Post-ballot destruction (85% public buildings destroyed, state collapse, two-thirds population displaced)

  • Joint Timorese-international assessment mission

    • Produced sectoral plans and budgets: no results target

    • Division of labour: civil service/judiciary versus economic and social reconstruction

    • A good start but………


Loss of control of reconstruction process during 2000

  • Fragmented aid delivery mechanisms

  • Reconstruction programs moved faster than civil service establishment - therefore lack of Timorese involvement in design and implementation

  • Results not specified clearly, so expectations too high

  • Results not measured - therefore perception that there were no results


Reconstruction benchmarks

  • Established in late 2000, driven by need to get back on track: focus efforts and measure progress

  • Criteria:

    • frequent achievable targets and monitoring, to build momentum

    • simple user-friendly format, to encourage cabinet and donor ownership

    • political, institutional, economic and social targets - strong links between sectors


Political

Affairs

Administrative

Handover

Public Finance

EconomicReconstruction

Social Reconstruction

Dec2000

üTraining Plans completed

o>85% of DG recruited

oPower billing in place

ü2 rounds of immunization done

Mar2001

üVoter registration complete

o>85% of DG recruited

ü20% capital budget

o>Budget spending at least 60%

üEstablishment of for infrastructure regional offices

ühealth administrators recruited

ü600 schools basic level operation

Jun2001

üConstitutional commissions formed

o40% of training delivered

xPlan for rural power station completed

üSchool mapping study completed

Sep2001

üFinalization of party candidates

üOfficial start of 6 weeks election campaign

oPerformance Mgt Training introduced

ü90% level 1-4 recruited

xStudy of power station completed

xPublic Works Office reconstructed

ü37 pre-school ready to open

oHospital reconstruction plan completed

Sample benchmarks


Achievements

  • Successfully accelerated pace of reconstruction

  • Became central to government process - introduced accountability in Cabinet and civil service

  • Helped Timorese leadership manage expectations

  • Helped improve Timorese-donor relationships and secured consistent aid flows

  • Created demand for better targets and more information


Disadvantages

  • Developed by small number of Timorese and international partners, endorsed by cabinet members - lack of wider ownership

  • Only measured government, not donors

  • Targets were generally outputs rather than outcomes, not linked to overall development vision


Next steps – the National Development Plan

  • Comprehensive bottom-up participatory process on vision and priorities, to meet national expectations (full independence May 2002)

  • Baseline data available

  • Reliant on new (weak) government structures and traditional civil society structures. Acted as capacity-building exercise for government

  • Included outcomes, heavily influenced by MDGs……

  • ………..but a christmas tree, lacked clear prioritisation of results and sequencing


Operationalisation of NDP

  • Transitional support program - “priorities of priorities”, links results to medium-term expenditure framework

  • Monitors both government and donors (budget support, technical assistance)

  • Still short-term and output-based, but much less than benchmarks

  • Work in progress - adapting MDGs to national context, matching targets to resources


Results frameworks are relevant for post-conflict reconstruction

  • Prioritisation is a particular problem when everything has been destroyed

    - helps government and donors prioritise efforts

  • Expectations are particularly high after peace agreements and pledging meetings

    - helps government and donors manage expectations

  • Government typically has little experience

    - simple management tool for new leaders and civil servants

  • Easier to introduce good systems, transparency and accountability right at the beginning than later


But are adjustments needed?

  • More need for short-term results to stabilise political situation

  • No baseline data ( and cannot do survey as first reconstruction project!), therefore initial results may need to focus on outputs

  • Needs specific capacity-building efforts, simple formats and frequent monitoring with new governments with little experience

  • Needs very strong information campaign to disseminate expected and actual results


ad
  • Login