Federal pesticide laws and regulations
Download
1 / 33

Federal Pesticide Laws - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 311 Views
  • Updated On :

Federal Pesticide Laws and Regulations. Stephen J. Toth, Jr. Wayne G. Buhler Department of Entomology Department of Horticultural Science North Carolina State University North Carolina State University. Photograph by Ken Hammond. Federal Pesticide Laws and Regulations.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Federal Pesticide Laws' - EllenMixel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Federal pesticide laws and regulations l.jpg
Federal Pesticide Lawsand Regulations

Stephen J. Toth, Jr. Wayne G. Buhler

Department of Entomology Department of Horticultural Science

North Carolina State University North Carolina State University

Photograph by Ken Hammond


Federal pesticide laws and regulations2 l.jpg
Federal Pesticide Laws and Regulations

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA): regulates the sale and use of pesticides

NCSU Communication Services

Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA): controls pesticide residues in food

Steve Toth


Federal insecticide act of 1910 l.jpg
Federal Insecticide Act of 1910

  • To ensure the quality of pesticide chemicals purchased by consumers

  • Set standards for manufacture of Paris green, lead arsenate, insecticides and fungicides

  • Provided for inspections, seizure of products and prosecution

USDA National

Agricultural Library


Federal insecticide fungicide and rodenticide act of 1947 l.jpg
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1947

  • Extended coverage to include herbicides and rodenticides

  • Required pesticide products to be registered with the U. S. Department of Agriculture

  • Established labeling standards for pesticides

USDA


Fifra amendments 1959 and 1964 l.jpg
FIFRA Amendments1959 and 1964

  • Added nematicides, plant regulators, defoliants and desiccants to the definition of “pesticide” or “economic poison”

  • Established federal registration numbers and signal words on labels

  • Secretary of Agriculture can suspend hazardous pesticide registrations

Tim McCabe


The federal environmental pesticide control act of 1972 l.jpg
The Federal EnvironmentalPesticide Control Act of 1972

  • Pesticides must be registered with the newly-created Environmental Protection Agency

  • Pesticides classified by EPA for “general” or “restricted” use

  • New pesticide registration standard to protect public health and environment

Ken Hammond


Fifra amendments 1975 1978 1980 and 1981 l.jpg
FIFRA Amendments1975, 1978, 1980 and 1981

  • Improvements in the registration process

  • Considerations of agricultural benefits of pesticides in regulatory decisions

  • Conditional registrations of pesticides allowed to reduce the registration backlog

USDA Agricultural Research Service


Pesticide reregistra l.jpg
Pesticide Reregistra

tion

  • Initiated by EPA in 1975 to bring the older pesticide chemicals up to current registration standards

  • “Special Review” to further review those pesticides that posed a risk or concern

  • FIFRA amended in 1988 to impose a 9-year schedule for the completion of reregistration and establish substantial registration fee


The worker protection standard for agricultural pesticides revised 1992 l.jpg
The Worker Protection Standard forAgricultural Pesticides (revised 1992)

  • Product labels modified to restrict entry of workers in pesticide-treated fields, specify protective clothing, and notify workers of fields treated with pesticides

  • Employers must provide safety training, sites for decontamination, and emergency treatment

Ken Hammond


Federal food and drug act of 1906 pure food law l.jpg
Federal Food and Drug Act of 1906(Pure Food Law)

  • Fresh, canned or frozen food shipped in interstate commerce must be pure and wholesome

  • Enforcement of law was the responsibility of the Secretary of Agriculture

  • Pesticide residues not considered

Dave Warren


Federal food drug and cosmetic act of 1938 l.jpg
Federal Food, Drug andCosmetic Act of 1938

  • Authorized the Food and Drug Administration to set tolerances for chemicals in food

  • Tolerances established for lead arsenate and Paris green on food

  • Coloring required for certain pesticides to prevent their use as flour

USDA Agricultural Research Service


Federal food drug and cosmetic act 1954 miller amendment l.jpg
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act1954 Miller Amendment

  • Tolerances required for all pesticides

  • Raw agricultural commodities condemned if they contained pesticide residues above FDA tolerance levels

Fred S. White


Federal food drug and cosmetic act 1958 food additives amendment l.jpg
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act1958 Food Additives Amendment

  • Covers food additives (i.e., chemicals remaining on food after processing)

  • Included the “Delaney Clause” which established a zero tolerance for food additives found to cause cancer

Tim McCabe


Delaney clause dilemma l.jpg
Delaney Clause Dilemma

  • EPA had “negligible risk” approach to pesticide residues in raw food (cancer risk of one-in-one-million)

  • Zero tolerance required for potential cancer-causing chemicals in processed food

  • Current technology allows for detection of extremely small residue levels

  • Different standards for raw and processed food created regulatory problem for EPA


Federal food drug and cosmetic act enforcement responsibility l.jpg
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic ActEnforcement Responsibility

  • EPA establishes tolerances for pesticide residues on raw and processed food

  • FDA enforces tolerances on most domestic and imported food

  • USDA enforces tolerances on meat, poultry and eggs

NCSU Communication Services

USDA Agricultural Research Service


Food quality protection act of 1996 l.jpg
Food Quality Protection Actof 1996

  • Passed unanimously by Congress in July 1996 with broad support from industry, agricultural groups, environmental and health organizations; signed into law in August 1996

  • Amended FIFRA and FFDCA

Dave Warren


Food quality protection act l.jpg
Food Quality Protection Act

Intended to:

  • Resolve the Delaney Paradox (zero tolerance for suspected carcinogens in processed food)

  • Protect children from pesticides in food (1993 National Academy of Science report)

  • Address the issue of endocrine disruption (1996 book “Our Stolen Future”)

Scott

Bauer


Food quality protection act of 199618 l.jpg
Food Quality Protection Actof 1996

  • Established a new, uniform standard for setting pesticide residue tolerances in both raw and processed food (i.e., a “reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure”)

  • Repels the “Delaney Clause”

Doug Wilson


Food quality protection act of 199619 l.jpg
Food Quality Protection Actof 1996

  • Allows EPA to add 10x safety factor when setting pesticide residue tolerances to protect infants, children and other sensitive population subgroups

Ken Hammond


Food quality protection act of 199620 l.jpg
Food Quality Protection Actof 1996

  • When setting tolerances, EPA must consider the aggregate exposure (food and non-food uses) of all pesticides having common mechanism of toxicity (e.g., organophosphates)

  • EPA must review all tolerances (about 9,700) within 10 years

Charles B. Ford

NCSU Communication Services


Potential impacts of the food quality protection act l.jpg
Potential Impacts of theFood Quality Protection Act

  • Elimination or loss of registrations for certain classes of pesticides, for example:

Organophosphate and

carbamate pesticides

due to human toxicity

EBDC fungicides due

to possible carcinogenic effects on humans

Tim McCabe


Potential impacts of the food quality protection act22 l.jpg
Potential Impacts of theFood Quality Protection Act

  • Elimination or loss of registrations for certain classes of pesticides (continued):

Organophosphates:

Disyston

Dursban/Lorsban

Guthion

Malathion

Methyl parathion

Monitor

Orthene

Carbamates:

Benlate

Furadan

Lannate

Sevin

Vydate

B2 Carcinogens:

Bravo

Captan

Dithane

Maneb

Vapam


Potential impacts of the food quality protection act23 l.jpg
Potential Impacts of theFood Quality Protection Act

  • Registrations for minor crop and specialty uses of pesticides dropped by registrants to lower risk (i.e., protect registrations with greater economic return)

Scott Bauer

Fred S. White

NCSU Communication Services


Potential impacts of the food quality protection act24 l.jpg
Potential Impacts of theFood Quality Protection Act

  • Section 18 registrations (emergency exemptions) will be needed more often due to lost registrations; however, will be harder to obtain

Time-limited tolerance for the pesticide on the crop is now required before an emergency exemption is granted

USDA Agricultural Research Service


Progress in the implementation of the food quality protection act l.jpg
Progress in the Implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act

  • EPA Tolerance Reassessment (FQPA Time Frames)

    • 33% by August 3, 1999

    • 66% by August 3, 2002

    • 100% by August 3, 2006

  • EPA met the first tolerance reassessment deadline by completing 3,290 tolerance reassessment decisions -- over 33% -- by August 3, 1999


Occupational safety and health act osha l.jpg
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Protection Act

  • The Act mandates that employers (including farmers) protect their employees from hazards in the workplace

  • Includes workers in pesticide manufacturing plants, pesticide applicators and farm workers

  • Requires written hazard communication plans, a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for each hazardous chemical, and training of employees on protective measures

NCSU Communication Services


Federal endangered species protection act l.jpg
Federal Endangered Species Protection Act Protection Act

  • The Act makes it unlawful to harm any plant or animal species listed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service as endangered or threatened

  • EPA developed Endangered Species Protection Program in cooperation with USDA, Fish and Wildlife Service

  • Pesticide use is restricted in areas near listed species

  • Pesticide labels instruct users to consult county bulletins listing locations where use of pesticides is restricted

Tim McCabe


Federal clean water act l.jpg
Federal Clean Water Act Protection Act

  • The Act protects nation’s waterways from both point source and non-point source pollution

  • Point source pollution is controlled by EPA through a permit system

  • Amendments in 1987 allow for restriction of non-point source pollution such as agricultural chemical run-off

  • States are required by EPA to submit management plans for non-point source pollution

Ken Hammond


Safe drinking water act l.jpg
Safe Drinking Water Act Protection Act

  • The Act authorizes EPA to establish maximum contaminant levels for pesticides in drinking water

Ken Hammond


Resource conservation and recovery act l.jpg
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Protection Act

  • The RCRA provides EPA with authority to regulate storage and disposal of pesticides and their containers

  • Discarded pesticides and containers can be considered solid waste (must meet certain criteria)

  • Regulations vary for “small quantity” and “large quantity” generators of hazardous waste

  • Farmers exempt if they triple- rinse used pesticide containers and dispose of them according to product label

Tim McCabe


Transportation safety act l.jpg
Transportation Safety Act Protection Act

  • The Act controls all modes of transportation of hazardous waste, including pesticides

  • U. S. Dept. of Transportation regulations cover handling, shipping, packing and labeling of pesticides; also covers placarding of vehicles

  • Regulations depend on hazard class to which a pesticide belongs

Ken Hammond


Food agriculture conservation and trade act of 1990 l.jpg
Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 Protection Act

  • The Act mandated that USDA require all certified pesticide applicators (private as well as commercial) to keep records of “restricted use” pesticide applications

  • Records must be kept by certified applicator for at least two years after application

NCSU Communication Services


Literature cited l.jpg
Literature Cited Protection Act

  • DiFonzo, C. 1998. Food Quality Protection Act: First Year Update. Pesticide Research Center, Michigan State University Extension. 4 pp.

  • Toth, S. J., Jr. 1996. Federal Pesticide Laws and Regulations. Southern Extension and Research Activity - Information Exchange Group 1. 4 pp http://ipmwww.ncsu.edu/safety/Southern_region/fed-pest.pdf


ad