Youth & Lifelong Learning Directorate. Informal e-learning Research Metadata for Community Content Project Fred Garnett Head of Community Programmes - Becta. Informal e-learning Research. Purpose;
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Informal e-learning Research
Metadata for Community Content Project
Head of Community Programmes - Becta
We were commissioned to provide Metadata for Community Content, for UK online centres, however we had no definition of what Community Content was because;
1. The Community Learning sector (ACL) does not have a defined agreed national curriculum
2. Community Learning is often non-vocational
3. Community Learning is often non-formal
4. Community Learning is often informal learning
5. UK online centres should provide ‘additionality’ – learning activities not provided for elsewhere.
6. UK online centres should provide ‘progression’ to formal learning
How do people learn on-line in UK online centres?
Metadata should map relevant community content and to how people learn informally.We drew together a team of people who worked in this context to brainstorm this;
Ronan O’Beirne of Shipley on-line
Ian Harford of the Manchester WEA CGfL
Malcolm Forbes of Brixton on-line CGfL
Steve Jeyes and Clive Church N.Lincs CGfL and Edexcel (inc Xtensis and IMS)
Alastair Clark and Fred Garnett (Becta – Derbyshire ACL & Lewisham TaLENT CGfL)
What is Community Content?
Given the nature of the learner; drop-in centres, supportive environment, personal interest related and self-directed, we decide to make some assumptions about;
The Learner – Informal Learner – aiming to meet personal needs
The Pedagogy – Androgogy – self-directed learning
The Resources – yet to be built – CGfL’s working towards this
So Community Content needed to be resources that supported informal or self-directed learning not aimed at achieving an existing qualification.
Brainstorming The Model
At this point we added in some values/observations relating to androgogy and informal learning;
Users surfing purposely to find information that meets their own needs, because, as LTRI inform us, they are very goal directed, and are very purposeful.
We assumed that centre users engaging in any self-directed activities were learners.
Learners come into centres and are supported in;
Identifying purposeful activities they wish to participate in
Accessing and using a PC
Accessing and surfing the internet
In learning they carry out any on-line activities and would move between on-line activities requesting different resources they need that were harder, easier, more technical that mapped to a subject or identified outcome, etc.
The Metadata should support ‘learning by stealth’
Bernie Dodge (web quests) identifies surfing as self-directed learning and he provide learners with assessment framework (rubric), so that they self-manage their learning process,
However our learning activities are not accredited as ‘learning’ it is ‘Unstructured Learning’.
Difficult to develop metadata for Unstructured Learning
We needed a framework to map to.
We wanted a Learning matrix that we could map any learning activity to.
What is already out there?
Learner Outcomes – Kevin Donovan and Tony Tait - LSDA
Education Levels – MEG work in progress on mapping UK educational levels
IMS – 5 Levels of difficulty - very crude
Research into Informal learning and Non-accredited learning
Informal Learning – NIACE – Veronica McGiverney and Jane Thompson
Non-accredited learning – LSDA and NIACE
What is missing?
Model of Informal e-learning
Resources to support this learning
Mapping of informal e-learning resources to ‘learning outcomes’
Understanding of how learners learn in UK online centres – the LTRI research
Develop and circulate a model of informal e-learning
Develop the process by which resources are provided
Identify and specify the skills needed in this process
Developing the matrix to which learner activities can be mapped
Develop the metadata to support mapping learning resources to the matrix
Identify what learner activities map to what learning outcomes
Develop and test some learning resources
Role of learner in managing their way through this process once mapped?
Demonstrating this ‘achievement’ e.g. – Portfolios (EIP – specification)
Transfer these Learning outcomes into all future activities (progression mapping?)