The north korean nuclear missile crisis
Download
1 / 32

Nuclear/Missile Crisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 297 Views
  • Updated On :

The North Korean Nuclear/Missile Crisis. Dr. Clay Moltz Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies October 2003. Current Crisis. October 2002—U.S. accuses DPRK of cheating U.S. cuts off heavy fuel oil

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Nuclear/Missile Crisis' - DoraAna


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The north korean nuclear missile crisis l.jpg

The North Korean Nuclear/Missile Crisis

Dr. Clay Moltz

Center for Nonproliferation Studies

Monterey Institute of International Studies

October 2003


Current crisis l.jpg
Current Crisis

  • October 2002—U.S. accuses DPRK of cheating

  • U.S. cuts off heavy fuel oil

  • DPRK withdraws from NPT; demands security assurances

  • DPRK restarts reactors, ousts IAEA inspectors

  • DPRK now says it is building bombs

  • How did we get here?


Overview l.jpg
Overview

  • Roots of “Korean Peninsula” nuclear crisis:

    • no treaty to end Korean War

    • South Korean crisis (1970s)

    • last communist state

  • Crisis raises alliance and security dilemmas

  • Poses questions for future nuclear/missile controls


History of the north korean nuclear program l.jpg
History of the North Korean Nuclear Program

  • Soviet assistance in civilian nuclear field

  • Post-Korean War agreement on nuclear training (1956)

  • Soviet provision of a 2 MWt research reactor

  • Yongbyon reactor installed in 1965

  • Possible planning for weapons capability


South korean nuclear program l.jpg
South Korean Nuclear Program

  • Nuclear power program in 1950s and 60s

  • U.S. deploys tactical nuclear weapons in S. Korea; but begins force cuts in 1970s

  • South Korean reacts with domestic nuclear weapons program in 1970s

  • U.S. negotiates end to S. Korean program, but with a cost

  • Precedent of “rewarding” a proliferator


Dprk decision making 1970s l.jpg
DPRK Decision-Making: 1970s

  • Fear of ROK cheating

  • Increasing political isolation from China and Soviet Union

  • Beginning to lose economic race with South

  • Drive to develop independent nuclear capability (for power, weapons, or both)


Nuclear expansion in 1980s l.jpg
Nuclear Expansion in 1980s

  • Weapons research, uranium mining/milling, and fuel fabrication facilities opened

  • 20 MWt (5 MWe) research reactor in Yongbyon

  • Construction of two power plants begun (gas-graphite reactors)

  • Power reactor deal with Soviets; DPRK forces to join NPT (1985)

Outside of Yongbyon-1 reactor

Yongbyon 20 MWt (5 MWe) reactor





Dprk missile program l.jpg
DPRK Missile Program

  • Attempts to produce Chinese missiles

  • Scuds from Egypt reverse-engineered

  • Development of independent production capability

  • Cooperation with states in Middle East; exports to Iran (War of the Cities)

  • Development of Nodong missile


International nuclear issues early 1990s l.jpg
International Nuclear Issues: Early 1990s

  • U.S. withdraws tactical nuclear weapons from ROK

  • Bilateral denuclearization agreement with South (1991)

  • IAEA safeguards agreement (1991) and DPRK facilities declaration (1992)

  • IAEA inspections reveal discrepancies


Agreed framework and kedo l.jpg
Agreed Framework and KEDO

  • IAEA calls for special inspection (February 1993)

  • DPRK initiates withdrawal from NPT (March 1993)

  • Jimmy Carter visits Pyongyang (July 1994)

  • Agreed Framework (October 1994)

  • Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) (1995)



Emerging missile concerns late 1990s l.jpg
Emerging Missile Concerns (late 1990s)

  • Beyond the Nodong

  • Rumsfeld Commission Report (July 1998)

  • Taepodong I test over Japan (August 1998)

  • Satellite or missile test?

  • Exports and financial incentives



Slide18 l.jpg

Taepodong I Test

(August 1998)



Other north korean wmd programs l.jpg
Other North Korean WMD Programs

  • Biological Weapons

    • Several facilities

    • Inadequate technologies

    • Problems of domestic health system/control

  • Chemical Weapons

    • Numerous facilities (stockpile of 5,000 tons)

    • Evidence of warheads

    • Threat to U.S. forces and ROK



Progress and problems pre 2000 l.jpg
Progress and Problems pre-2000

  • Delays in Agreed Framework

  • Missile test/moratorium for food aid

  • Normalization of relations (Italy, Australia, UK); economic engagement (South Korean tourism)

  • But apparent DPRK nuclear cheating

  • Clinton fails to reach missile deal


U s dprk relations today l.jpg
U.S.-DPRK Relations Today

  • Pres. Bush’s distrust of Agreed Framework

  • “Axis of evil” speech and DPRK fears

  • October 2002, April 2003, August 2003 DPRK threats and nuclear claims

  • Agreed Framework frozen


How far is dprk from a bomb l.jpg
How Far is DPRK from a Bomb?

  • Pu on hand: 12-20 kg.

  • Pu in spent fuel rods that could be reprocessed: 25 kg.

  • Pu production of 5 kg./year at Yongbyon

  • Future uranium enrichment and other Pu reactors?


How far is the dprk from an icbm l.jpg
How Far is the DPRK from an ICBM?

  • Limitations (payloads, CEPs, numbers)

  • Multiple stages and range extension

  • Taepodong II and CONUS: terror weapon

  • Japan?

  • Is a deal possible?


Current dilemmas l.jpg
Current Dilemmas

  • DPRK need for electricity, food, investment, and security

  • U.S. distaste for “propping up” Kim; but lack of attractive military options

  • Mutual dissatisfaction with Agreed Framework

    • DPRK’s view: no reactors, no security guarantees

    • U.S. view: weapons research ongoing, reactors risky





Current policy options l.jpg
Current Policy Options

  • Pressure DPRK (join with allies/IAEA and force Kim to back down)

  • Appease Kim (buy him off using security guarantees and economic tools)

  • Deal with Kim (negotiate destruction of weapons programs, but provide aid for economy)—Combination


Conclusion l.jpg
Conclusion

  • Nuclear/missile threat is increasing over time (how to stop the clock?)

  • Using incentives while ensuring compliance

  • Longer-term requirement: halting “demand” for weapons within North Korea

  • New framework for Korean Peninsula


ad