Chapter 17 Welfare Policies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chapter 17 welfare policies l.jpg
Download
1 / 10

Chapter 17 Welfare Policies. Linda Hantrais. Welfare Policies. Why study European welfare policies? Conceptualising, theorising and measuring welfare Differentiating national social welfare systems Developing European social welfare competence and legitimacy

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Chapter 17 Welfare Policies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Chapter 17 welfare policies l.jpg

Chapter 17Welfare Policies

Linda Hantrais


Welfare policies l.jpg

Welfare Policies

  • Why study European welfare policies?

  • Conceptualising, theorising and measuring welfare

  • Differentiating national social welfare systems

  • Developing European social welfare competence and legitimacy

  • European integration, globalisation and welfare convergence


Why study european welfare policies l.jpg

Why study European welfare policies?

  • Lens through which to examine European integration

  • Key to understanding economic policy

  • Part of wider relationship between national welfare systems and wider processes of European integration/globalization


Conceptualising welfare l.jpg

Conceptualising Welfare

  • Social welfare refers to collective provision of resources to protect against risk/need and to improve living standards

  • The state is key in delivering these resources

  • Inter-related with economic system


Theorising welfare l.jpg

Theorising Welfare

  • Social democratic perspectives emphasize universality of needs

  • Neo-liberals promote minimal provisions

  • Third way looks for alternatives to state welfare

  • Feminists argue that welfare is gendered to the disadvantage of women


Measuring welfare l.jpg

Measuring Welfare

  • Nationally-specific measurements make cross-national comparisons difficult

  • On average, 25% of GDP in EU15

  • Welfare funded differently in different countries

  • Impact of welfare systems also varies across countries


Differentiating national welfare systems l.jpg

Differentiating national welfare systems

  • Differentiated in terms of decommodification (Esping-Andersen):

    • Social democratic welfare regimes

    • Conservative/corporatist welfare regimes

    • Liberal welfare regimes

  • Southern European and Eastern European member states struggle to fit into this scheme


Eu welfare systems l.jpg

EU welfare systems

  • Original 6 member states – corporatist welfare regimes

  • 1970s and 1990s enlargement has shifted the EU towards social democratic welfare regime

  • However, UK has moved towards liberal regime

  • Southern European welfare states rely heavily on self-provision by family members

  • 2004 CEECs have adopted a hybrid system


Developing social welfare competence and legitimacy l.jpg

Developing social welfare competence and legitimacy

  • EEC social policy originally intended to support common market

  • By 1990s, social policy gaining greater legitimacy, but still as support for economic integration

  • UK vetoed social policy chapter in Maastricht Treaty

  • Governments have moved to a softer approach to social policy, esp. OMC


European integration globalization and welfare convergence l.jpg

European integration, globalization and welfare convergence

  • Economic integration has not reduced path dependent diversity between states

  • Social integration is becoming more necessary, so preventing ‘race to the bottom’

  • National policies/institutions mediate common pressures, producing divergent outcomes

  • National diversity remains in place


  • Login