monitoring the safety of influenza a h1n1 2009 monovalent vaccines
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Monitoring the Safety of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 56

Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 326 Views
  • Uploaded on

Monitoring the Safety of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines Claudia Vellozzi, MD, MPH Immunization Safety Office Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA November 18, 2009

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Today' - Ava


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
monitoring the safety of influenza a h1n1 2009 monovalent vaccines

Monitoring the Safety of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines

Claudia Vellozzi, MD, MPH

Immunization Safety Office

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlanta, GA

November 18, 2009

overall objectives for 2009 h1n1 vaccine safety monitoring
Overall Objectives for 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Safety Monitoring

Identify clinically significant adverse events following receipt of 2009 HINI vaccine in a timely manner

Rapidly evaluate serious adverse events following receipt of 2009 H1N1 vaccine and determine public health importance

Evaluate if there is a risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with the 2009 H1N1 vaccine

Communicate vaccine safety information in a clear and transparent manner to healthcare providers, public health officials, and the public

today s objectives
Today’s Objectives
  • Describe the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office surveillance systems for monitoring the safety of 2009 H1N1 vaccine
  • Provide preliminary data from each of these systems
vaccine safety datalink vsd background
Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD): Background
  • Established in 1990
  • A collaborative project among CDC and 8 managed care organizations (MCOs)
  • Allows for planned immunization safety studies as well as timely investigations arising from
    • hypotheses from medical literature and pre-licensure
    • reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
    • changes in immunization schedules, or the introduction of new vaccines
  • Since 2005, conducts routine Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA) of newly licensed and approved vaccines or modifications to existing vaccine recommendations
vsd population
VSD Population
  • Collects medical care and vaccination data on more than 9.5 million members annually (3.1% of the US population)
  • As of 12/31/2008:
      • 2,252,024 children (<18) enrolled
        • 3.0% of US population
      • 7,245,835 adults (≥18) enrolled
        • 3.1% of US population
      • Average yearly birth cohort ~ 95,000
vsd sites 2009

Group Health Cooperative

Health Partners

Marshfield Clinic

AHIP

Kaiser Permanente Colorado

So. CA Kaiser Permanente

CDC

VSD Sites: 2009

Northwest Kaiser Permanente

Harvard Pilgrim

No. CA Kaiser Permanente

vsd data files chart review

Hospital discharge diagnosis codes

Enrollment and demographics

+

Linked by Study IDs

Outpatient and Clinic visits

Birth and death certificate information

VSD Data Files + Chart Review

Immunizations Records

vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine safety monitoring specific aims
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Safety Monitoring Specific Aims
  • Conduct rapid surveillance of 2009 H1N1 vaccine safety using
    • self controlled case series (SCCS) using binomial maximized sequential probability ratio tests (maxSPRT)
    • comparisons with historical seasonal influenza vaccines using Poisson maxSPRT
  • Conduct comprehensive analyses after immunization program is completed of associations between H1N1 vaccine and adverse events using a variety of statistical methods
    • Confirmatory Logistic Regression, SCCS, others (as needed)
sccs example

Vaccination

    • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Days -56 -15 0 42 84
  • Unexposed (pre)ExposedUnexposed (post)
SCCS Example
vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine adverse events under surveillance
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Adverse Events under surveillance
  • GBS – first ever and first in a year diagnosis, complemented by chart review
  • Demyelinating disease
  • Disorders of the peripheral nervous system and neuropathies
  • Seizures (epilepsy, convulsions)
  • Encephalitis, myelitis, encephalomyelitis
  • Bell’s Palsy
  • Other cranial nerve disorders (Facial nerve disorders, Trigeminal nerve disorders)
  • Ataxia (other cerebellar ataxia, ataxia)
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Angioneurotic edema, Allergic Reaction, Urticaria
  • Myocarditis and pericarditis (LAIV only)
  • Hemorrhagic stroke (subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, other and unspecified intracranial hemorrhage)
  • Ischemic stroke (excludes transient ischemic attack)
  • Wheezing (LAIV only)
      • Asthma, wheezing, respiratory distress/insufficiency, other diseases of trachea/bronchi
      • Multiple definitions with and without bronchiolitis
  • Pregnancy Outcomes –
      • Spontaneous Abortions, Stillborn & Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia
  • Adjuvanted Outcomes –
      • Autoimmune hepatitis and Thrombocytopenia
vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine pregnancy studies
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Pregnancy Studies
  • Active surveillance in pregnant women
    • Outcomes: Fever (>100° F),allergic reactions, miscarriage, stillbirth, premature labor and preeclampsia (includes 2 VSD sites)
  • Retrospective analysis evaluating the safety of 2009 H1N1 vaccines in pregnant women and their offspring (includes all VSD sites)
vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine pregnancy studies13
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Pregnancy Studies

Conduct a survey of pregnant women who receive any combination of seasonal or H1N1 vaccines or refuse vaccination (includes one VSD site)

Specific Aims

  • Assess where and when pregnant women are vaccinated and if not vaccinated—why not
  • Accurately capture pregnancy related start dates for future linkage with the electronic medical record
  • Assess non-medically attended AEs
    • Systemic and local reactions (Fever, chills, headache, swelling, etc.)
    • ILI and URI symptoms, GI symtoms, sleep disturbances, other
2009 10 seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine tiv sccs preliminary results
2009-10 Seasonal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV): SCCS –preliminary results

TotalDoses Administered– 2,045,127

2009 10 seasonal tiv historical comparison preliminary results
2009-10 Seasonal TIV Historical Comparison-preliminary results

Total Doses Administered: 2,045,127

summary
Summary
  • No potential associations or signals have been identified following the monitoring of 2009-10 Seasonal TIV (2,045,127) and LAIV (100,366) doses
  • 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines have only recently begun to be administered in the VSD MCOs and data are insufficient to assess the safety of the vaccines
  • The VSD will continue to monitor both seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccines on a weekly basis
slide22
EIP Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) Surveillance Project:Association of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Vaccine and GBS
eip gbs surveillance sites 2009 2010

New York

Minnesota

Oregon

California

Colorado

Maryland

Tennessee

New Mexico

Georgia

Population: ~ 44.9 million

EIP GBS Surveillance Sites, 2009-2010

Connecticut

eip guillain barr surveillance gbs surveillance project
EIP Guillain-Barré Surveillance (GBS) Surveillance Project
  • CDC\'s Emerging Infections Program (EIP)
    • partnership of state and local health departments, academic centers, and CDC
    • performs surveillance and public health research on emerging infections
  • October 1, 2009 time limited surveillance for GBS
  • Objectives:
    • Rapidly detect cases of GBS and report (with vaccination status)
    • Assess and measure if there is an association between 2009 (H1N1) vaccine and GBS
  • Methods:
    • Population ~45 million persons (statewide in CT, MD, MN, NM, TN and selected regions of CA, CO, GA, NY, and OR)
    • Active network of neurologists and acute care facilities contacted weekly
    • Report all GBS cases, standardized case finding, medical record abstraction, patient interviews
    • Calculation of measures of association
eip guillain barre surveillance case finding

reported weekly

to CDC

10 EIP (40 million)

Brighton

1, 2

Confirmed

Clinical Network *

Active Case-Finding

Possible Cases

Brighton

3

Probable

Patient Interviews

Record review;

contact provider;

antecedent & vaccine history

Additional:

Hospital discharges

Passive provider reporting

(reportable condition)

AAN educational initiative;

VAERS

Info

pending

Indeterminate

Exclusion (non-cases)

[Brighton not met or other neurologic diagnosis]

Re-assess

at 14 days

EIP Guillain-Barre Surveillance Case Finding

* Weekly query with established network of neurology providers, sentinel pharmacies

descriptive epidemiology of gbs active case finding oct 1 nov 9 2009
Descriptive Epidemiology of GBS Active Case Finding, Oct 1-Nov 9, 2009

*www.Brightoncollaboration.org

select methods using vaccine coverage data
Select Methods Using Vaccine Coverage Data
  • Observed vs. historical GBS rates
    • Compares observed no. GBS cases occurring within 42 days of H1N1 vaccination to expected no. among vaccinees
    • Earliest incidence metric
    • Limitations:
      • historical rate comparison (may not be valid comparison, different case finding)
      • Initially only crude, or age-specific with assumptions on vaccine administration
      • With BFRSS data, fewer assumptions needed for age-specific comparisons
  • GBS rates in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated persons
    • Use BFRSS vaccine coverage data, calculate person-time exposed and unexposed to vaccine, calculate rates
    • Strength: rates in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons will both be calculated from active surveillance data
    • Limitations
      • BRFSS data not available until mid-November and may only be available at the state level (not EIP catchment area specific)
  • GBS rates in H1N1 vaccinated vs. seasonal vaccine recipients
    • Use BFRSS vaccine coverage data
    • Age-adjust
real time immunization monitoring system rtims
Real Time Immunization Monitoring System (RTIMS)

Contributors:

  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHU)
  • CDC ISO (AHIP)
  • WorldAPP (WA)
  • State and local health departments (HD)
  • Hospitals, schools, clinics, pharmacies
rtims
RTIMS
  • Automated web-based surveillance system
  • Captures self reported data from vaccine recipients
  • Predecessor: Telewatch
    • Used for monitoring patients with chronic diseases
    • Modified for monitoring yellow fever vaccine1
    • Piloted for influenza vaccine November 2008
  • Capacity:
    • On line and database: 1-10 million vaccine recipients
    • Follow-up personnel: expandable
objectives
Objectives

To monitor influenza vaccine recipients for adverse events (early signal detection)

To identify host factors associated with adverse events

To compare rates of adverse events associated with different influenza vaccine products

To expedite reporting of AEs to VAERS

study population
Study Population

Seasonal & 2009 H1N1 Influenza vaccine recipients

Target population – Pregnant women, health care workers, school aged children

State & local health departments, hospitals, schools and OB clinics

timeline for surveys
Timeline for Surveys

Baseline

survey

1st

Follow up

Pregnancy

Follow-up?

2nd

Follow-up

Day 2 Day 7 Day 42

rtims information flow
RTIMS Information Flow

Permission to Contact

at Time of Vaccination

or

Electronic

(Registries)

or

Vaccine

Recipient

Paper

www.myflushot.org

website sign-up

Weblinks

CDC, JHU, HDs

link

www.myflushot.org

JHU

Data entry

Formatting

WorldAPP

RTIMS Survey

3-4 min initial

<1 min follow-up

limitations
Limitations
  • Surveys after vaccination
  • Possible selection bias:
    • Females more likely to participate
    • Persons with reactions more likely to complete?
    • Drop outs?
  • Some reluctance to have VAERS form filed
    • name and contact information
  • Active solicitation of symptoms
    • Some multiple symptoms
acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
  • VSD
    • Eric Weintraub
    • James Baggs
    • Frank DeStefano
  • CDC/EIP
    • Melissa Viray
    • Paige Lewis
    • Oliver Morgan
    • Scott Fridkin
  • RTIMS
    • Neal Halsey
    • Rosanna Setse
the vsd distributed data model

CDC

“Direct”

SAS Programs, Logs, Output, & Analytical Datasets

Hub

“Indirect”

The VSD Distributed Data Model
vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine study design and analytic plan
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Study Design and Analytic Plan
  • Challenges for studying the safety of influenza vaccines
    • Confounding by indication
    • Vaccine recommendations have expanded and changed
    • Influenza vaccines are often given over a very short period of time.
    • Individuals may have received vaccine outside their MCO (count as unvaccinated)
    • Seasonality of adverse events may confound interpretation
  • To address the challenges to monitor 2009 H1N1 safety more than one approach will be included in both:
    • Rapid Cycle Analyses (RCA) weekly surveillance (near real time and critical to rapid safety assessment)
    • End of season analysis
vsd 2009 h1n1 vaccine adverse event definitions
VSD 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Adverse Event Definitions
  • Risk periods (windows)
    • AE-specific as described in published studies or biologic plausibility
    • Length of windows – vary from 2 to 60 days
    • Day of vaccination included in the risk period if it is biologically plausible for AE to occur same day of vaccination (e.g., anaphylaxis).
  • To improve the specificity
    • Limit to AEs occuring in inpatient or ED settings
    • First event to occur in a year
  • For AEs that may have more than one “new” onset in a year a shorter period of time will be included in analysis (ex;wheezing, seizures)
how the vsd evaluates signals
How the VSD Evaluates Signals
  • Check data quality
  • Check inputs, background incidences, i.e. temporal trends
  • Check whether comparison groups are defined appropriately
  • Conduct the analysis using a different control group (e.g., concurrent vs. historical) or different vaccine
  • Conduct a temporal scan to see if outcomes cluster during a post-vaccination time window
  • Conduct a definitive study using logistic regression analysis
  • Review charts to confirm or exclude cases as true cases
vsd investigators and collaborators partial list
Centers For Disease Control, VSD team

James Baggs, PhD

Julianne Gee, MPH

Natalie McCarthy, MPH

Eric Weintraub, MPH

Kaiser Permanente of No. California (NCK),

Oakland CA

Roger Baxter, MD

Nicky Klein, MD, PhD

Ned Lewis

Northwest Kaiser Permanente (NWK),

Portland OR

Allison Naleway, PhD

John Mullooly, PhD

Karen Riedlinger

Lois Drew

Harvard Pilgrim /Harv. Vanguard (HAR)

Boston, MA

Tracy Lieu, MD, MPH

Richard Platt, MD, MSc

Katherine Yih, PhD, MPH

Richard Fox

Grace Lee, MD, MPH

Sharon Greene, MD, MPH

Group Health Cooperative (GHC), Seattle WA

Lisa Jackson, MD, MPH

Jennifer Nelson, PhD

Lora Bounds

Marshfield Clinic Rsch. Foundation (MFC)

Marshfield WI

Edward Belongia, MD

James Donahue, MD

Nick Berger

Health Partners Rsch Foundation (HPM)

Minneapolis MN

Jim Nordin, MD

Amy Butani

Kaiser Permanente of Colorado (KPC)

Denver, CO

Simon Hambidge, MD, PhD

Jason Glanz, MS, PhD

David McClure, PhD

Matt Daley, MD

David Ryerson

So. California Kaiser Permanente (SCK), CA

Los Angeles, CA

Steven Jacobson, MD, PhD

Wansu Chen, MS

Sungching Glenn, MS

VSD Investigators and Collaborators - Partial List

Sites include > 125 staff working on VSD

eip guillain barre surveillance timeline

Case Only Methods:

Descriptive Epidemiology

Observed vs. Background Rates of GBS:

Crude and Age-Specific Comparisons

Estimated GBS Rates in Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Persons:

Crude and Age-Specific Comparisons

Case-Cohort analysis

BRFSS Vaccine Coverage Data Available

Potential Analytic Studies:

Self Control Case Series (SCCS)

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

OCT

EIP Guillain-Barre Surveillance Timeline

Vaccine Delivered

links clicked on to arrive at http www myflushot org
Links clicked on to arrive at http://www.myflushot.org

HITS Entry Link________________________________________________________

3615 http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm

3486 Unknown

1240 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety_qa.htm

1123 Entered URL directly

917 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/

589 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_keyfacts.htm

564 http:// www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/vaccination/pregnant_qa.htm

358 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/gbs_qa.htm

327 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety.htm

303 http:// www.in.gov/flu/

178 http:// www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/general.htm

105 http:// cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm

103 http:// www.in.gov/flu/2443.htm

94 http:// www.vaccinesafety.edu/

>60% of traffic comes from the CDC

2009 10 seasonal tiv historical comparison preliminary results56
2009-10 Seasonal TIV Historical Comparison-preliminary results

Total Doses Administered: 2,045,127

ad