slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Guidance and Workshops on Aggregate and Cumulative Assessments

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 1

This poster does not necessarily reflect EPA policy. Mention ... - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 312 Views
  • Uploaded on

Planning and scoping for cumulative risk assessment What: description of concepts for up-front thinking to lay out process Why: guide the first step, emphasizing broad scope & integrated dialogue Who: Office of Science Policy When: 1997 (guidance)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'This poster does not necessarily reflect EPA policy. Mention ...' - Audrey


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Planning and scoping for cumulative risk assessment

What: description of concepts for up-front thinking to lay out process

Why:guide the first step, emphasizing broad scope & integrated dialogue

Who: Office of Science Policy

When:1997 (guidance)

Workshops on Chemical Mixtures Health Risk Assessment

What: teaches risk assessment methods for evaluating multiple chemicals

Why:technical transfer to the risk assessment community

Who: National Center for Environmental Assessment

When:2000-2005 (workshops at the Society for Risk Analysis National

Meeting, the Toxicology and Risk Assessment Annual Conference,

Regional and State EPA groups).

Agency Guidelines and Guidance

Published guidance on approaches for cumulative risk

assessment include the 1986 mixture risk guidelines, the 1989 toxicity

equivalence factor approach for dioxins, the 1997 guidance on planning and

scoping for cumulative risk, the 2000 supplementary guidance for mixture risk,

and the 2003 framework for conducting cumulative risk assessment. Future publications

include a report on approaches for conducting cumulative risk assessment at contaminated

sites (2005) and cumulative risk assessment guidelines (2012).

Workshops and Training

Workshops held by the Office of Science Policy, the Risk Assessment Forum, the National Center

for Environmental Research and the National Center for Environmental Assessment range from

training sessions on assessment methods in published EPA guidance to discussions of case studies

from Regional and Program Offices. Most of these are open to the public. The interaction between

the scientists, risk managers, academics and stakeholders addresses technical and implementation

issues, such as relevant mathematical models, quantitative uncertainties, jargon differences,

software, measurements, and critical research gaps. Recent workshops include the application

of dioxin toxicity equivalence factors to fish and wildlife (1998), mixture risk assessment

training at the Society for Risk Analysis annual meetings (1999 - 2004), and the

joint ORD-Regional workshop on cumulative risk assessment (2002) at

which several Regional and Program Office case studies of

cumulative risk assessments were described.

Planning and scoping lessons learned

What: summary of experience from studies since the 1997 guidance

Why:encourage formal planning & scoping of environmental assessments

Who: Office of Science Policy

When:2002 (report with case studies)

Workshop on cumulative risk assessment

What: user-based evaluation of current programs, approaches, and needs

Why:focus and prioritize Agency research, leverage interagency efforts

Who: Office of Science Policy, with Regional Offices

When:2002 (workshop summary)

Framework for cumulative risk assessment

What: description of umbrella issues, concepts, and general approaches

Why:guide overall integrated organization for many types of assessments

Who: Risk Assessment Forum

When:2003 (framework report)

Approaches for cumulative health risk assessment

What: ways to assess combined health risks at contaminated sites

Why:translate basic concepts to suggestions for practical

implementation

Who: National Center for Environmental Assessment

When:2005 (planned final report)

Case studies for cumulative risk assessment

What:summary of examples, including community-based pilot studies

Why:provide insights to help others conduct cumulative risk assessments

Who: Risk Assessment Forum

When:2005-2006 (effort underway)

Guidance and Workshops on Aggregate and Cumulative Assessments

Rick Hertzberg1, Ed Bender2, David Klauder2, Linda Teuschler1, Glenn Rice1, and Bill Wood1, Chris Saint3

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 1NCEA, 2OSP, 3NCER

Impact and Outcomes

Science Question

How can theoretical and laboratory research be developed into feasible tools and approaches for conducting and communicating aggregate and cumulative risk assessment?

How can assessment models and procedures be harmonized across aggregate and cumulative assessments?

How can we quantify environmental and physiological interactions in aggregate exposures to a single chemical so that those interactions can be incorporated into risk assessment guidance?

How important qualitatively and quantitatively are interactions- in transport, environmental transformation, and toxicity of multiple chemicals, especially at environmental levels? Can tiered approaches be developed to assist risk assessors in addressing interactions only when needed?

Development and communication of practical methods for conducting aggregate and cumulative risk assessment, in the form of risk assessment guidance and training, not only improves the dialogue between researchers, decision makers and stakeholders, but also leads to more accurate and complete risk estimation.

ORD’s supplementary mixture risk guidance (EPA 2000) and related training workshops led to ORD participation in the Office of Pesticide Programs’ development of cumulative risk guidance, and inclusion of ORD’s relative potency factor approach in that guidance.

Previous criticism that EPA’s mixture risk assessments ignored synergism and antagonism is now solved by ORD’s interaction-based Hazard Index (EPA 2000).

Chemical mixtures: guidance for assessing health risks

What: how to evaluate mixtures data, approaches for whole mixtures, index chemicals methods for groups, interactions data usage

Why:update 1986 guidelines for multiple chemicals to enhance

methods

Who: National Center for Environmental Assessment

When:2000 (guidance)

Future Directions

Research Goals

Aggregate and cumulative risk assessments, both fairly new to EPA, will push toward a paradigm shift in Agency risk management. Shifting from traditional source based risk assessments to population based cumulative risk assessments (EPA 2003) addresses community concerns, including environmental justice issues, of combined impacts on susceptible communities from multiple exposures. Risk estimates made for whole communities or for complex sites have the potential for tremendous health and economic impacts; thus research to improve risk assessment methods, harmonization through Agency-wide guidance, and training on application of such methods is critical.

The complexity of aggregate and cumulative risk assessments is best approached by an interdisciplinary team that ranges from bench scientists, epidemiologists and mathematicians to frontline enforcers of regulations. ORD has stimulated that activity by two main vehicles: agency risk assessment guidance and open workshops.

Agency guidance from ORD is usually either focused guidance from individual labs or centers, or guidelines from the Risk Assessment Forum that form Agency science policy. Risk assessment guidance often addresses complex issues using methods based mainly on structured scientific judgment, including science policy decisions for default approaches and values. By including Program and Regional Offices in the authorship and review, ORD guidance usually has broad concurrence and covers wide ranges of application.

Workshop on Application of dioxin TEF’s to fish and wildlife

What: evaluate uncertainties in TEF development and their impact in

ecological risk assessments

Why:animals are exposed to complex mixtures of dioxins and furans

Who: EPA Regional Offices and ORD, and Dept. of the Interior

When:1998 (workshop report 2001)

References

Risk Assessment Forum

http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/index.cfm

Office of Science Policy

http://www.epa.gov/osp/regions/cumrisk_rep.pdf

Workshop on STAR Grants- Session on mixtures risk assessment

What:public presentations on Science To Achieve Results Program

Why:foster exchange between EPA scientists and STAR grant recipients

Who: National Center for Environmental Research and Region III

When:October 28-29, 2004, Philadelphia

Guidelines for cumulative risk assessment

What: approaches for assessing multiple route exposures to chemical

mixtures and other non-chemical stressors from multiple sources

over time; population-based assessments, including vulnerable

subpopulations

Why:address concerns about combined risks in urban communities

Who: Risk Assessment Forum Technical Panel

When:2012 (guidelines)

ad