Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease ...
Download
1 / 47

bitens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 267 Views
  • Updated On :

Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial Melody Lee, MD UCSF Family and Community Medicine Journal Club January 21, 2005 Introduction: Context Obesity has become an epidemic Introduction: Context

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'bitens' - Audrey


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Melody Lee, MD

UCSF Family and Community Medicine

Journal Club

January 21, 2005


Introduction context l.jpg
Introduction: Context Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Obesity has become an epidemic


Introduction context3 l.jpg
Introduction: Context Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Popular diets have become increasingly prevalent and controversial

  • Patients and clinicians are interested in using popular diets for disease prevention

  • However, there is little data regarding the relative benefits, risks, effectiveness and sustainability of popular diets


Slide4 l.jpg
Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Michael L. Dansinger; Joi Augustin Gleason; John L. Griffith; Harry P. Selker; Ernst J. Schaefer JAMA. Jan 5, 2005;293:43-53.


Goals l.jpg
Goals Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Assess the effectiveness of four popular diets for weight loss and cardiac risk factors, and to assess self-reported adherence rates to each diet


Study description l.jpg
Study description Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Single-center one-year randomized trial at an academic center in Boston, Mass

  • Enrolled July 2000- January 2002


Methods inclusion criteria l.jpg
Methods: Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized TrialInclusion Criteria

  • Adults with BMI between 27 and 42

  • At least one of the following metabolic risk factors:

    • Fasting glucose > 110mg/dL

    • Total cholesterol > 200 mg/dL

    • LDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL

    • HDL cholesterol< 40 mg/dL

    • Triglycerides > 150 mg/dL

    • SBP >145 or DBP > 90

  • Or current use of oral medications to treat HTN, DM, or dyslipidemia


Methods exclusion criteria l.jpg
Methods: Exclusion Criteria Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Unstable chronic illness

  • Insulin therapy

  • Urinary microalbumin > 2 times normal

  • Serum creatinine > 1.4mg/dL

  • Clinically significant LFT or TFT abnormalities

  • Weight loss medication

  • Pregnancy


Methods participants l.jpg
Methods: Participants Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Recruited in Greater Boston area via newspaper advertisements, television publicity

  • 1010 screened via telephone (513 not interested or too busy)

  • 247 screened in person (22 no risk factors, 14 too busy, 13 diets too extreme)

  • 160 final participants

  • 40 participants randomized to each diet group


Methods randomization l.jpg
Methods: Randomization Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Participants chose 1 of 4 class times

  • Once approximately 10 participants per class time, 1 of 4 diets were assigned to the small group by according to computer-generated randomized Latin square sequence

  • Each diet was assigned to each class time only once per cycle x 4 cycles


Methods blinding l.jpg
Methods: Blinding Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Study personnel blinded to dietary assignment until after small group roster finalized to avoid recruiting bias

  • Diet assignment was revealed to small group at first meeting and participants were given diet specific rationale, written materials, and official diet cookbook

  • Lab personnel were blinded


Methods intervention l.jpg
Methods: Intervention Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • One of four popular diets: Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, or Ornish

  • Only dietary components, not other aspects that may be unique to dietary program


Methods dietary intervention l.jpg
Methods: Dietary Intervention Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Less than 20 g of carbohydrate daily with a gradual increase to 50 g daily

  • 40-30-30 balance of percentage calories from carbohydrate, fat, and protein respectively


Methods dietary intervention14 l.jpg
Methods: Dietary Intervention Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Keep total daily “points” in a range determined by current weight. Each point 50 calories. Participants roughly aimed for 24-32 points daily. Point values for certain food provided through diet

  • Vegetarian diet containing 10% calories from fat


Methods standard intervention l.jpg
Methods: Standard Intervention Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Standard recommendation: daily MVI, 60 minutes of exercise weekly, avoid commercial support services

  • A dietician and physician met with each small group for 1 hour on 4 occasions during the first 2 months of study

  • Subsequent meetings aimed to maximize adherence by reinforcing positive changes and addressing barriers to adherence

  • After 2 months, participants were encouraged to follow their assigned diet according to their interest


Methods outcomes l.jpg
Methods: Outcomes Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Participants were blinded to timing of assessments until 2 weeks prior

  • Three main outcomes were studied:

    • Weight loss

    • Cardiac risk factors

    • Adherence


Methods determining weight loss l.jpg
Methods: Determining Weight Loss Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Baseline weight taken 2 weeks prior to dietary intervention, subsequent weight assessed using same scale with light clothing and no shoes


Methods determining cardiac risk factors l.jpg
Methods: Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized TrialDetermining Cardiac Risk Factors

  • Overnight fast:

    • Total cholesterol

    • HDL cholesterol

    • Triglycerides

    • Glucose

    • Insulin

    • High sensitivity C-reactive protein

    • Creatinine

  • Friedewald formula for LDL cholesterol

  • 24-hour urine for total protein, nitrogen and creatinine


Methods determining adherence l.jpg
Methods: Determining Adherence Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Submitted 3-day food records at 1,2,6 and 12 months were entered into computer program that calculated average daily macronutreints and micronutrients and adherence was scored on a 10 point scale (0=baseline to 10=perfect adherence)

  • Self report of adherence in past 30 days using same scoring system


Methods analysis l.jpg
Methods: Analysis Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Standard statistical analysis

  • The assumption was made that participants who discontinued the study were unchanged from baseline

  • Investigators examined the data twice: (1) with the missing data substituted by baseline values (2) with the missing data excluded


Results participants l.jpg
Results: Participants Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • The 40 participants in each diet group were similar in terms of baseline characteristics

  • At baseline there was no significant differences in caloric or macronutrients between diet groups

  • Mean age 49, range 22-72

  • 81/160 women


Results attrition and aes l.jpg
Results: Attrition and AEs Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Attrition was 21% at 2 months, 38% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months

  • At 12 months, there was a nonsignificant trend (P=0.08) toward a lower continuation rate for more extreme diets (Atkins and Ornish) compared to moderate diets (Zone and Weight Watchers)

  • The most common reasons for discontinuation was (1) assigned diet was too difficult or (2) not yielding enough weight loss

  • No adverse events


Results weight loss l.jpg
Results: Weight Loss Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • All 4 diets resulted in statistically significant, albeit modest, weight loss at 12 months.

  • There was not a statistically significant difference between the diets

  • Greater effects were observed in study completers

  • 25% of initial participants lost 5% of initial body weight, 10 % of participants lost 10% or more


Results weight loss24 l.jpg
Results: Weight Loss Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial


Results dietary intake l.jpg
Results: Dietary Intake Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • At one year, the mean daily caloric reduction from baseline was 138 for Atkins, 251 for Zone, 244 for Weight watchers and 192 for Ornish (p<0.5 all groups and p=0.70 between diets)


Results weight loss associated with adherence l.jpg
Results: Weight Loss Associated with Adherence Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • There was a strong curvilinear association between self-reported dietary adherence and weight loss (r=0.60; p< .001)

  • Participants in the top tertile of adherence lost 7% of body weight on average


Weight loss by diet type and weight loss by dietary adherence l.jpg
Weight loss by diet type and Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trialweight loss by dietary adherence


Results cardiac risk factors l.jpg
Results: Cardiac Risk Factors Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • All diets achieved modest, but statistically significant improvements in several cardiac risk factors at 1 year

  • No diets significantly altered triglycerides, blood pressure, or fasting glucoses at 1 year


Results cardiac risk factors29 l.jpg
Results: Cardiac Risk Factors Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Statistically significant


Results weight loss associated with improvement of cardiac risk factors l.jpg
Results: Weight loss Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trialassociated with improvement of cardiac risk factors

  • The amount of weight loss predicted the amount of improvement in several cardiac risk factors: Total/ HDL cholesterol ratio (r=-0.36), C-reactive protein (r=-0.37), and Insulin levels (r=-0.39)


Cardiac risk factors as a function of weight loss l.jpg
Cardiac risk factors as Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Triala function of weight loss


Results adherence l.jpg
Results: Adherence Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Dietary adherence per 3-day diet records and self report decreased progressively with time

  • Approximately 25% of participants in each diet group sustained a mean adherence level of at least 6-10


Mean self reported dietary adherence scores of all 4 diet groups l.jpg
Mean Self-reported Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized TrialDietary Adherence Scores of All 4 Diet Groups


Results exercise l.jpg
Results: Exercise Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • Exercise levels per self-report (minimal, mild, moderate, vigorous) increased from baseline throughout the trial (p<0.5), and did not differ between diets

  • No significant association between change in exercise and either weight loss or cardiac risk factor improvement


Study conclusions l.jpg
Study Conclusions Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • A variety of popular diets can reduce weight and cardiac risk factors under realistic conditions, but only for the most adherent

  • Sustained adherence to a diet rather than diet type was the key predictor of weight loss and cardiac risk factor reduction


Discussion is this study relevant l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study relevant? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Can I apply it to my clinic population?

A: Probably. The participants in this study are not medically dissimilar to patients in our clinics and the study is realistic. However, participants who called likely more motivated than typical patient. Study did not report SES, language, ethnicity, etc.


Discussion is this study relevant37 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study relevant? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Are the likely benefits worth the potential harms and cost?

A: Probably. Obesity has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality and even modest weight loss has benefit. No obvious harm in the short term. Long term has not been studied. Also, does being on a diet decrease quality of life?


Discussion is this study relevant38 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study relevant? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Were all the clinically important outcomes considered?

A: Possibly. Besides weight loss and cardiac risk factors which have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality, investigators could have examined quality of life. Mortality was beyond the scope of this study.


Discussion is this study valid l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Was the assignment of participants to intervention random?

A: Yes, a computer generated a diet to each small group and at only one of 4 meeting times


Discussion is this study valid40 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Was follow up complete?

A: No. This study drop out rate was large at 42% (consistent with dropout rates in other diet studies). Data was analyzed with the assumption was that those who discontinued would be back to baseline and missing data was substituted with baseline. This is a very conservative measure. Results were consistent when missing data was excluded entirely from the analysis


Discussion is this study valid41 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Were patients analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?

A: Yes, this study followed the intention to treat principle


Discussion is this study valid42 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Were participants, clinicians and personnel blinded to the intervention?

A: No, participants and providers knew which diet they were assigned by the first meeting, which could have affected outcomes depending on expectations, biases. (those optimistic about the diet they’ve been assigned may do better) Only the lab personnel was blinded, the person least likely to affect outcome.


Discussion is this study valid43 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?

A: Yes: demographically, as well as by baseline weight, caloric intake and cardiac risk factors


Discussion is this study valid44 l.jpg
Discussion: Is this study valid? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: Were the groups treated equally apart from their intervention?

A: Maybe. Investigators standardized their recommendation for daily MVI, 60 minutes of exercise/ week, and avoiding commercial support. However they did give each participant the corresponding literature and cookbooks, which are different from one another. Also, there was no mention of standardized small group meeting content or structure


Discussion what are the results l.jpg
Discussion: What are the results? Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

Q: How large and precise was the treatment effect?

A: Results were only modest in weight loss and improvement in cardiac risk factors, but statistically significant.


Discussion l.jpg
Discussion Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • What if you just held the meetings and followed weight and cardiac risk factors?

  • How accurate is the data? Diet records usually underestimate

  • How real is the adherence score? It may be all relative


Application l.jpg
Application Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial

  • What advice would I give to patients who want to lose weight? Tell them to just pick the diet that you think will work for you and stick to it?

  • Would I recommend a diet based on a patient’s cardiac risk factors?

  • How can I encourage dietary adherence?


ad