arc branch meeting challenging behaviour positive behavioural support
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
ARC branch meeting Challenging Behaviour & Positive Behavioural Support

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 35

ARC branch meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 378 Views
  • Uploaded on

ABM Ymddiriedolaeth Prifysgol GIG Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University NHS Trust. ARC branch meeting Challenging Behaviour & Positive Behavioural Support. Dr. Edwin Jones. People with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'ARC branch meeting' - Antony


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
arc branch meeting challenging behaviour positive behavioural support

ABM

Ymddiriedolaeth Prifysgol GIG

Abertawe Bro Morgannwg

University NHS Trust

ARC branch meetingChallenging Behaviour & Positive Behavioural Support

Dr. Edwin Jones

people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour
People with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour
  • one of the most vulnerable groups in society and are at increased risk of social exclusion, abuse, inappropriate treatment, deprivation and systematic neglect.
  • Between 10-15% of the population of people with learning disabilities
  • Definition:

‘Culturally abnormal behaviour of such an intensity, frequency or duration that the physical safety of the person or others is likely to be placed in serious jeopardy, or behaviour which is likely to seriously limit or deny access to and use of ordinary community facilities’ (Emerson, 1995)

  • aggression,
  • destructiveness,
  • self injury,
  • Wide range of other behaviours which may be harmful to the individual (e.g eating inedible objects) and/or challenging for carers and staff (e.g. non compliance, persistent screaming, disturbed sleep patterns, over-activity, stereotyped mannerisms ) and /or objectionable to members of the public (e.g. regurgitation of food, smearing of faeces, inappropriate sexual behaviour).
  • the primary risk factor for out of family placement and institutionalisation
the nature of challenging behaviour
The Nature of Challenging Behaviour
  • ‘…such behaviours represent challenges to services rather than problems which individuals with learning disabilities carry around with them. If services could rise to the ‘challenge’ of dealing with these behaviours , they would cease to be ‘problems’ ’ (Blunden & Allen, 1987)
  • ‘ …the competence or capability of local ‘mainstream services for people with learning disabilities will…influence the number of people defined as presenting a serious challenge. Well organised and managed services…will show fewer problems’ (Mansell Report, 1993)
slide4

Induction & refresher practical training in work-related skills

Practice Leadership

Multi-disciplinary support

Person-centred

Proactive orientation

Staff Supervision

Active Support

Clear proactive & reactive plans

Weekly staff meetings

QA system in place

Proactive stress management for staff

No induction training

Administrative ‘leadership’

Reactive orientation

Staff-orientated

Low engagement levels

Quarterly, optional staff meetings

No staff supervision

No auditing of care plans

- last up date 2 years ago

No clear emergency management plans

Challenging Behaviour & Service Competence

Severe Self Injury

Physical Aggression

Smearing Faeces

Pica

mansell ii
‘Investment is required to achieve two aims: -to develop and expand the capacity of local services for people with learning disabilities to understand and respond to challenging behaviour- to provide specialist services locally which can support good mainstream practice as well as directly serve a small number of people with the most challenging behaviour’

(para.48)

Mansell II
mapping study spt 2004
Mapping study (SPT, 2004)
  • 1,458 children and adults identified within the Bro Morgannwg LD Directorate area
  • At any one point in time, approximately 175 will receive input from the Specialist Services (SBT, AATU, CHC)
  • 80% plus of people who challenge will therefore be supported within social care frameworks & with inputs from CSTs
slide7

Training (Mansell II)

  • ‘A key contribution to local capability is that staff working with people whose behaviour represents a challenge have adequate training. Many services at present attempt to deal with the challenge they face by adding more and more staff at greater and greater cost.’ (para.87)
  • The necessary skills include ‘person-centred active support, Positive Behavioural Support, Total Communication, Recognising and responding to mental health problems, & person centred planning’ (para.87)
  • ‘NVQs are seen as too general, and too heavily influenced by assumptions relevant to services for older people, to be as useful as they should for staff supporting people with whose behaviour presents a challenge.’ (para. 89)……..’Greater emphasis ought to be possible …on the skills needed to work with people whose behaviour presents a challenge’ (para. 90)
  • Need to develop more relevant, practical training
normalisation social role valorization
Normalisation/ Social Role Valorization
  • Getting the good things in life for vulnerable ‘devalued’ people
  • Defined: “the use of culturally valued means in order to enable people to live culturally valued lives (Wolfensberger, 1980)
  • Primary aim is: “the creation, support and defence of valued social roles for people at risk of devaluation” (Wolfensberger, 1983)
  • Major emphasis on the effect of societal process such as labelling, segregation and congregation of devalued groups in exacerbating the nature of a person’s disability and the need to change these
slide9

Criticisms of SRV/ Normalisation

  • Advocates an intervention strategy that lacks a scientific base:‘The minimal amount of data that is available does not suggest the applicability of non-specific treatments such as normalisation, which basically consists of a community placement with a de-emphasis on formalised training’(Marchetti & Matson, 1981)
  • Misinterpretations!!!!

Choice perversion

Making people normal

aims service accomplishments o brien 1987
AIMS (service accomplishments)O’Brien (1987)
  • Community presence
  • Choice
  • Competence
  • Respect
  • Participation
applied behaviour analysis
Applied Behaviour Analysis
  • Applied: in that the behaviours and events should be of importance to society
  • Behavioural: in that research should be concerned with what people do
  • Analytic: in that research should provide a believable demonstration of the events that can be responsible for the occurrence or no occurrence of behaviour, usually by demonstration of experimental control
  • Technological: in that techniques used are identified and described in a manner that allows replication
  • Conceptually Systematic: in that procedures used are shown to be relevant to basic behavioural principles
  • Effective: in that socially significant changes in behaviour are achieved
  • General: In that the behavioural change ‘proves durable over time…appears in a wide variety of possible environments or..spreads to a variety of related behaviours.
  • Evidence based:large body of research evidence built up over several decades
criticisms of aba
Criticisms of ABA
  • Represents a dehumanising technology for the repressive social control of disabled individuals
  • Punishment/ aversives most common ‘treatment’ given to people WLD &CB
  • Use of behavioural approaches is ‘endangering the chances of people living ordinary lives’ (Walker, 1987)
  • Presents a unique set of moral and ethical problems relating to the social control of others- ‘the aversive debate’- the end justifies the means vs human rights
slide13
‘Like many ‘tools’ behaviour modification techniques are themselves morally blind. Like a stout sword, they work equally well in the hands of hero or tyrant’ (Wood, 1983)
the origins of pbs
The Origins of PBS

The Aversives Debate

ABA:

a toolkit with no values base

SRV:

a values base with no toolkit

Positive Behavioural Support: a values-based toolkit for supporting behaviour change

slide15

Positive Behavioural Support

Applied Behaviour Analysis

(Science)

PCP

(Philosophy & framework)

Normalisation/

SRV

(Philosophy)

+

+

=

Positive Behavioural Support:A values-led toolkit for behaviour change

what can pbs achieve
What can PBS achieve?
  • 68% of positive behavioural interventions achieve 80% or more reduction in behaviour from baseline levels
  • Produce small to significant changes in adaptive behaviour
  • Can show significant maintenance over time
  • Can result in effective lifestyle change
  • More effective if interventions involve environmental reorganisation
  • More effective if regular carers/ staff deliver
  • Better results in environments with active programming (day activity, skill development etc.)
  • Better results in integrated settings
slide17

A PBS Model

  • Primary Prevention: changing aspects of a person’s living, working and recreational environments so that the possibility of aggressive behaviour occurring is reduced.
  • Secondary Prevention: actively listening for early indicators of behaviour and early intervention to divert behavioural escalation.
  • Reactive Strategies:ethical responses to risk behaviours that maximise the safety of both service users and carers
slide18

Access to Behavioural Support in UK

  • Rates of use of behaviour change strategies, restraint & medication for challenging behaviours
training effectiveness spt pbs training lowe et al 2007
Training Effectiveness: SPT PBS Training(Lowe et al., 2007)
  • Vocational qualification, designed originally for Directorate staff
  • Initial induction then paper based, self-instructional mode
  • Significant changes in knowledge, most notably for unqualified staff
  • Significant changes in self-reports of confidence in dealing with challenging behaviour, maintained over time
  • Very positive student evaluations (‘the quality of the course has been excellent’ ‘ given me a greater understanding of what is expected of me in my new role’)
  • Very positive evaluations from clinicians
our challenge
Our Challenge

‘ …the competence or capability of local ‘mainstream services for people with learning disabilities will…influence the number of people defined as presenting a serious challenge. Well organised and managed services…will show fewer problems’ (Mansell Report, 1993)

How to disseminate the critical skills of PBS required for the support of people who challenge in the necessary volume and in an accessible, cost-effective format?

Effective Training Model Developed

our response no easy answers
Our response: No easy answers

Remind

  • effective training

Explain

  • why e learning

Show

  • content

Tell

  • how to access
human services
Human Services

Most staff

  • Don’t have formal qualifications
  • Don’t have key skills when appointed
  • Receive little training once in post

Assumption that anyone & everyone knows how to help people with complex needs

Clements & Zarkowska (1994)

traditional approaches to training are ineffective
Traditional Approaches to Training are ineffective
  • ‘Short-course training, in one off blocks, causes no disturbance to organisations and established systems, it provides staff with time away and some material comfort, and it provides trainers with powerful social and material reinforcement. From a behavioural perspective it is irresistible in terms of the reinforcement contingencies operating on all those involved’ (Clements, 1993)
slide24

Effective training strategies

Combinations of different training techniques, reinforced by on-going management attention is most effective (e.g. Anderson 1987; Jones et al 1987)

3 steps to competence--LaVigna et al (1994)

3 levels of training
Advanced/specialist level

Advanced Professional Diploma in PBS

senior practitioners, behaviour specialists, staff with management & leadership responsibilities

Intermediate level

Advanced Diploma in PBS

registered nurses, deputy managers, first-line managers in social care etc.

Entry level

Advanced Certificate in PBS

nursing assistants, support workers, classroom assistants, parents etc.

3 levels of training

3

Adv Prof Diploma NVQ 4/5

2

Prof Diploma NVQ 3/4

1

Adv Certificate

NVQ 2/3

contemporary services
Contemporary services
  • Small-scale community based
  • 5-10,000+ staff may require training
  • Dispersed geographical area
  • Several agencies
  • Limited resources
  • Difficult & expensive to release staff for classroom based training
  • High staff turnover = train frequently
  • Variable skills & abilities of workforce
benefits advantages of e learning
Dispersed geographical area

5-10,000+ staff

Several agencies

Limited resources

Difficult & expensive to release staff for classroom based training

High staff turnover = train frequently

Variability in skills & abilities of workforce

Continuous access not limited by time or geography across multiple agencies

In high volume to individuals or groups with minimal release from workplace

Very low-cost to users- after initial development

Easy access to refresh/ update

Flexible to suit different learning styles and paces

Benefits/ advantages of e learning
and there s more
And there’s more ……..

Fully addresses first 2 steps to competence and considered ‘capable of predicting’ how learners will perform in practice

Proven to be reliable and

highly effective

rapidly enhances problem solving skills

Goodness of fit with the future training delivery strategies of many progressive support providers

Online assessment & support can

give immediate feedback

Provide for more authentic simulations of real world environments

disadvantages risks of e learning
Challenges

Availability of computers

Access to internet (dialup / broadband?)

Computer literacy

Computer phobia

Cannot achieve in vivo competence

Responses

Clear evidence of increased availability and access

Don’t have to be experts—just learn basics

Organisational IT support

Blended approach work-based activities / mentors and managers

Disadvantages/risks of e learning
interested
Interested?

Contact: Jo Wheeler, BTEC Co-ordinator

[email protected]

CADSG Assessment Centre

Directorate of Learning Disability Services

Glanrhyd Hospital

Tondu road

Bridgend

CF31 4 LN

Phone 01656 753849

  • Time: Around 120 hours to complete (21 hrs on line, 90 hrs off line)
  • Money: Total cost £150 per person
  • Modest discounts depending on how many staff an organisation registers
  • 2-10 staff =£135
  • 11-20 staff =£127.50
  • 20+ staff =£120
  • Limited number of bursaries available for parents /unpaid carers
advanced diploma in p b s
Advanced Diploma in P B S

240 hours (45 online, 195 off line) costs £170- £190

10 units :

  • Contemporary service values
  • Person-Centred Planning;
  • Behavioural analysis
  • Mental health and treatment options
  • Primary prevention including Active Support
  • Inclusive Communication
  • Secondary prevention
  • Reactive strategies
  • How to construct a PBS plan
  • Managing PBS, including goodness of fit, training carers, positive monitoring, monitoring effectiveness, troubleshooting and Periodic Service Review.

Accreditation

  • BTEC/Edexel, - nationally recognised qualification.
  • mapped against NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework.
  • National Occupational Standards
  • Operationalise the guidance in the Mansell Report (revised edition, 2007) and comply with National Minimum Standards.
ad