1 / 51

Chapter 13. Risk & Return in Asset Pricing Models

Chapter 13. Risk & Return in Asset Pricing Models. Portfolio Theory Managing Risk Asset Pricing Models. I. Portfolio Theory. how does investor decide among group of assets? assume: investors are risk averse additional compensation for risk tradeoff between risk and expected return. goal.

Anita
Download Presentation

Chapter 13. Risk & Return in Asset Pricing Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 13. Risk & Return inAsset Pricing Models • Portfolio Theory • Managing Risk • Asset Pricing Models

  2. I. Portfolio Theory • how does investor decide among group of assets? • assume: investors are risk averse • additional compensation for risk • tradeoff between risk and expected return

  3. goal • efficient or optimal portfolio • for a given risk, maximize exp. return • OR • for a given exp. return, minimize the risk

  4. tools • measure risk, return • quantify risk/return tradeoff

  5. Measuring Return • R is ex post • based on past data, and is known • R is typically annualized change in asset value + income return = R = initial value

  6. example 1 • Tbill, 1 month holding period • buy for $9488, sell for $9528 • 1 month R: 9528 - 9488 = .0042 = .42% 9488

  7. annualized R: (1.0042)12 - 1 = .052 = 5.2%

  8. example 2 • 100 shares IBM, 9 months • buy for $62, sell for $101.50 • $.80 dividends • 9 month R: 101.50 - 62 + .80 = .65 =65% 62

  9. annualized R: (1.65)12/9 - 1 = .95 = 95%

  10. Expected Return • measuring likely future return • based on probability distribution • random variable E(R) = SUM(Ri x Prob(Ri))

  11. example 1 R Prob(R) 10% .2 5% .4 -5% .4 E(R) = (.2)10% + (.4)5% + (.4)(-5%) = 2%

  12. example 2 R Prob(R) 1% .3 2% .4 3% .3 E(R) = (.3)1% + (.4)2% + (.3)(3%) = 2%

  13. examples 1 & 2 • same expected return • but not same return structure • returns in example 1 are more variable

  14. Risk • measure likely fluctuation in return • how much will R vary from E(R) • how likely is actual R to vary from E(R) • measured by • variance (s2) • standard deviation (s)

  15. s2 = SUM[(Ri - E(R))2 x Prob(Ri)] s = SQRT(s2)

  16. example 1 s2 = (.2)(10%-2%)2 + (.4)(5%-2%)2 + (.4)(-5%-2%)2 = .0039 s = 6.24%

  17. example 2 s2 = (.3)(1%-2%)2 + (.4)(2%-2%)2 + (.3)(3%-2%)2 = .00006 s = .77%

  18. same expected return • but example 2 has a lower risk • preferred by risk averse investors • variance works best with symmetric distributions

  19. prob(R) prob(R) R R E(R) E(R) symmetric asymmetric

  20. II. Managing risk • Diversification • holding a group of assets • lower risk w/out lowering E(R)

  21. Why? • individual assets do not have same return pattern • combining assets reduces overall return variation

  22. two types of risk • unsystematic risk • specific to a firm • can be eliminated through diversification • examples: -- Safeway and a strike -- Microsoft and antitrust cases

  23. systematic risk • market risk • cannot be eliminated through diversification • due to factors affecting all assets -- energy prices, interest rates, inflation, business cycles

  24. example • choose stocks from NYSE listings • go from 1 stock to 20 stocks • reduce risk by 40-50%

  25. s unsystematic risk total risk systematic risk # assets

  26. measuring relative risk • if some risk is diversifiable, • then sis not the best measure of risk • σ is an absolute measure of risk • need a measure just for the systematic component

  27. Beta, b • variation in asset/portfolio return relative to return of market portfolio • mkt. portfolio = mkt. index -- S&P 500 or NYSE index % change in asset return b = % change in market return

  28. interpreting b • if b = 0 • asset is risk free • if b = 1 • asset return = market return • if b > 1 • asset is riskier than market index • b < 1 • asset is less risky than market index

  29. Sample betas (monthly returns, 5 years back)

  30. measuring b • estimated by regression • data on returns of assets • data on returns of market index • estimate

  31. problems • what length for return interval? • weekly? monthly? annually? • choice of market index? • NYSE, S&P 500 • survivor bias

  32. # of observations (how far back?) • 5 years? • 50 years? • time period? • 1970-1980? • 1990-2000?

  33. III. Asset Pricing Models • CAPM • Capital Asset Pricing Model • 1964, Sharpe, Linter • quantifies the risk/return tradeoff

  34. assume • investors choose risky and risk-free asset • no transactions costs, taxes • same expectations, time horizon • risk averse investors

  35. implication • expected return is a function of • beta • risk free return • market return

  36. or where is the portfolio risk premium is the market risk premium

  37. so if b >1, > • portfolio exp. return is larger than exp. market return • riskier portfolio has larger exp. return >

  38. so if b <1, < • portfolio exp. return is smaller than exp. market return • less risky portfolio has smaller exp. return <

  39. so if b =1, = • portfolio exp. return is same than exp. market return • equal risk portfolio means equal exp. return =

  40. so if b = 0, = 0 • portfolio exp. return is equal to risk free return =

  41. example • Rm = 10%, Rf = 3%, b = 2.5

  42. CAPM tells us size of risk/return tradeoff • CAPM tells use the price of risk

  43. Testing the CAPM • CAPM overpredicts returns • return under CAPM > actual return • relationship between β and return? • some studies it is positive • some recent studies argue no relationship (1992 Fama & French)

  44. other factors important in determining returns • January effect • firm size effect • day-of-the-week effect • ratio of book value to market value

  45. problems w/ testing CAPM • Roll critique (1977) • CAPM not testable • do not observe E(R), only R • do not observe true Rm • do not observe true Rf • results are sensitive to the sample period

  46. APT • Arbitrage Pricing Theory • 1976, Ross • assume: • several factors affect E(R) • does not specify factors

  47. implications • E(R) is a function of several factors, F each with its own b

  48. APT vs. CAPM • APT is more general • many factors • unspecified factors • CAPM is a special case of the APT • 1 factor • factor is market risk premium

  49. testing the APT • how many factors? • what are the factors? • 1980 Chen, Roll, and Ross • industrial production • inflation • yield curve slope • other yield spreads

More Related