Salmon and energy
Download
1 / 62

Salmon and Energy: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 353 Views
  • Uploaded on

Salmon and Energy:. Do We Have Enough Power to Remove the Dams? by Katherine Hausrath [email protected] www.britishenergy.com/environment/BE/school/. http://www.bluefish.org/opendams.htm. Thank you .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Salmon and Energy:' - Albert_Lan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Salmon and energy

Salmon and Energy:

Do We Have Enough Power to Remove the Dams?

by

Katherine Hausrath

[email protected]

www.britishenergy.com/environment/BE/school/

http://www.bluefish.org/opendams.htm


Thank you
Thank you

  • Reed Burkholder, a long-time advocate of the salmon, who pointed me towards the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers websites and other information.


Scope of my presentation
Scope of My Presentation

  • Background

    • Dams

    • Salmon

  • Why are the dams a problem?

    • Scientific issues

    • Legal issues

  • Energy issues


Where are the dams
Where are the dams?

  • On the lower Snake River

  • West of Lewiston, Idaho

  • In southeastern Washington

http://www.sci.wsu.edu/idea/Salmon/salmon.html


The lower snake river
The lower Snake River

http://protophoto.com/picture.html?pic=2807


The four dams
The four dams

  • Lower Granite – constructed in 1975

  • Little Goose - constructed in 1970

  • Lower Monumental - constructed in 1969

  • Ice Harbor - constructed in 1962


Lower granite dam
Lower Granite Dam

http://crunch.tec.army.mil/nid/webpages/nidviewpictures.cfm?ID=100607&ACC=1


Lower monumental dam
Lower Monumental Dam

http://crunch.tec.army.mil/nid/webpages/nidviewpictures.cfm?ID=100599&ACC=1


Ice harbor dam
Ice Harbor Dam

http://crunch.tec.army.mil/nid/webpages/nidviewpictures.cfm?ID=100605&ACC=1


Who owns the dams
Who owns the dams?

  • The US Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation own and operate the 31 dams on the Snake and Columbia Rivers.

  • The Army Corps of Engineers owns the four dams at issue.

    Bonneville Power Administration, Who Are We? (April 7, 2004), at http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/About_BPA/.


Bonneville power administration
Bonneville Power Administration

  • Part of the Department of Energy, but not tax-supported.

  • Markets the electricity from the dams to the Pacific Northwest’s public and private utilities.

    Bonneville Power Administration, Who Are We? (April 7, 2004), at http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/About_BPA/.


Why were the dams built
Why were the dams built?

  • Irrigation

  • Creating an inland port

  • Hydropower


Irrigation
Irrigation

  • Only Ice Harbor provides irrigation.

  • Only provides water to 35,000 acres on 24 farms.

    Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition, The

    Columbia & Snake Rivers Interactive Map, at

    http://www.removedams.org/interactive%5Fmap

    (last visited April 5, 2004);See alsoMichael C.

    Blumm, et al., Symposium on Water Law: Saving

    Snake River Water and Salmon Simultaneously: The

    Biological, Economic and Legal Case for Breaching

    the Lower Snake River Dams, Lowering the JohnDay

    Reservoir, and Restoring Natural River Flows, 28

    Envtl. L. 997, 1024 (1998) (hereinafter Blumm).

http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/irsprayhigh.html


Idaho s inland port
Idaho’s Inland Port

  • The chief economic benefit is navigation.

  • The dams allow Lewiston, Idaho, 465 miles upriver from the Pacific ocean, to be a “seaport.”

    Blumm at 1024.

http://www.idahofuturetravel.info/PortTrns.asp


Hydropower
Hydropower

  • The dams produce about 5% of the Northwest’s power.

  • I will discuss this in much greater detail later.

    Blumm at 1024.


Not flood control
NOT Flood Control

  • None of the four lower Snake River dams are authorized for flood control.

    Blumm at note 155 (citing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Columbia River System Operation Review, Final

    Environmental Impact Statement 3-3 (1995)).


Salmon
Salmon

  • Anadromous – which means they spend time in fresh water and the ocean.

  • 4-5 year life span.

  • Five species:

    • Sockeye (pictured)

    • Chinook

    • Chum

    • Coho

    • Pink.

      U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, What’s a Salmon?,athttp://salmonofthewest.fws.gov/default.htm (Mar. 24, 2004).

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/1salmon/salmesa/mapswitc.htm


Why are the dams a problem
Why are the dams a problem?

  • The Dams’ Impact on Salmon

  • Importance of Protecting Salmon

    • Endangered Species Act

    • Native American treaties

    • Salmon’s role in the ecosystem


Negative impacts of the dams
Negative Impacts of the Dams

  • Salmon need fast-moving, cold water.

  • Dams create slow-moving, warm pools of water ideal for predators of salmon.

  • Dams block/impede salmon migration.

City of Seattle, Habitat Salmon Needs at Each Stage of the Life Cycle, (last visited April 8, 2004), at

http://www.cityofseattle.net/salmon/needs.htm


Salmon only have a short time period to move between fresh and salt water
Salmon only have a short time period to move between fresh and salt water

  • When baby salmon (smolts) begin to move toward the sea, they only have a set amount of time before their bodies can no longer tolerate fresh water.

  • In reverse, when adults come back to spawn, they only have a set amount of time before they die.

City of Seattle, Habitat Salmon Needs at Each Stage of the Life Cycle, (last visited April 8, 2004), at

http://www.cityofseattle.net/salmon/needs.htm


Scientific opinion
Scientific Opinion and salt water

  • NMFS attributes 80% of the decline in the salmon populations directly to the Snake River dams.

  • The Army Corps of Engineers found that the dams have raised the aggregate mortality of juvenile salmon in the 330 miles of continuous reservoir created by the four Snake River Dams from 33-75%.

    Chris Garrett, The Political Symbolism of Dams, (1999) (citing United States Army Corps of Engineers, Lower

    Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study, (1997)) at

    http://www.whitman.edu/environmental_studies/WWRB/damsymbol.htm


Endangered species act
Endangered Species Act and salt water

  • Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) in 1973.

  • The ESA’s purpose is to conserve and recover “listed” species as well as the ecosystems upon which these species depend.

    Endangered Species Act, § 1531(b).


National marine fisheries service
National Marine Fisheries Service and salt water

  • NMFS – responsible for ESA-listed salmon and steelhead (a type of salmonid) - as well as all other marine species.

  • NMFS has listed 26 populations of salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake Rivers as endangered, threatened, or candidate species.

    National Marine Fisheries Service, Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead, at

    http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/1salmon/salmesa/pubs/1pgr.pdf (Mar. 25, 2004).


Listed populations of salmon
Listed Populations of Salmon and salt water

  • Sockeye – one endangered and one threatened population.

  • Chinook – two endangered, seven threatened, one candidate populations.

  • Coho – two threatened populations, three candidate populations.

  • Chum – two threatened populations.

  • Pink – none presently listed.

  • Steelhead– two endangered, eight threatened and one candidate species.

    National Marine Fisheries Service, Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead, at

    tp://www.nwr.noaa.gov/1salmon/salmesa/pubs/1pgr.pdf (Mar. 25, 2004)


Esa jeopardy decisions
ESA Jeopardy Decisions and salt water

  • § 7 - Agencies whose actions may affect listed species of anadromous fish must “consult” with NMFS.

  • NMFS decided that the federal Columbia Basin dam operations would jeopardize the continued existence of listed salmon and steelhead.

  • NMFS must then discuss the availability of reasonable alternatives that it can take to avoid jeopardy.


Nmfs decided that dam breaching is not a reasonable alternative
NMFS decided that dam-breaching is not a “reasonable alternative.”

  • NMFS is currently attempting to protect the salmon through methods besides breaching the dams.


Methods besides dam breaching
Methods Besides Dam-breaching alternative.”

  • Barging has been the most common on the four dams at issue.

  • Smolts (juvenile salmon) are collected at the dams, loaded on trucks or barges, and are released below the dams.

  • This is not effective.

    See Blumm.

http://www.taxpayer.net/snake/GAOfactsheet.pdf


Other ineffective methods
Other Ineffective Methods alternative.”

  • Fish ladders (pictured)

  • Spilling water at dams over the spillway.

  • Spilling water over the dams is somewhat effective, but is not done if the water gets low.

  • None of these options are as effective as dam-breaching.

    See Blumm.

http://www.steinborn.org/jim/gifs/alaska2/bonneville-fish-ladder.JPG ,


Breaching the dams is the best scientific option
Breaching the Dams is the best scientific option alternative.”

  • Scientists agree that breaching the dam is the best option, scientifically, for recovering the salmon.

  • Idaho Department of Fish and Game has said the “natural river option is the best biological choice for recovering salmon and steelhead in Idaho...with the highest certainty of success and lowest risk of failure, and is consistent with the preponderance of scientific data.”

Blumm at 1012 (quoting Idaho Dep't of Fish & Game, Report to the Director, Idaho's Anadromous Fish Stocks: Their Status and Recovery Options 16 (1998)).


The controversy and the reason for nmfs decision was mainly political
The controversy, and the reason for NMFS’ decision was mainly political.

  • I will address economic issues surrounding the breaching of the dams later.


Native american treaty rights
Native American Treaty Rights mainly political.

http://www.watershed-watch.org/ww/Photos/dipnetting.html


The tribes
The Tribes mainly political.

  • The Nez Perce Tribe

  • The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation

  • The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon

  • The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation

Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Treaties, (April 4, 2004), athttp://www.critfc.org/text/treaties.html


The land
The Land mainly political.

  • In 1855, the tribes signed four treaties that ceded over 35 million acres of the Columbia River basin to the United States in exchange for…

Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Treaties, (April 4, 2004), athttp://www.critfc.org/text/treaties.html


The treaty text
The Treaty Text mainly political.

  • “The exclusive right of taking fish in the streams running through and bordering said reservation is hereby secured to said Indians; and at all other usual and accustomed stations, in common with citizens of the United States, and of erecting suitable houses for curing the same; also the privilege of hunting, gathering roots and berries, and pasturing their stock on unclaimed lands, in common with citizens, is secured to them.”

    Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Treaties, (April 4, 2004), athttp://www.critfc.org/text/treaties.html

    (emphasis added).


Supreme court decisions
Supreme Court Decisions mainly political.

  • 1905 - Treaties are to be interpreted the way the Indians understood them. U.S. v. Winans.

  • 1979 - The tribes were entitled to a “fair share” of the fish, which was interpreted as 50% of the harvestable fish destined for the tribes’ usual and accustomed fishing places. U.S. v. Washington.

    U.S. v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371, 371 (1905); U.S. v. Washington, 444 U.S. 816, 816 (1979).


Salmon s role in the ecosystem
Salmon’s Role in the Ecosystem mainly political.

  • Many species depend upon salmon for food, including bears.

http://www.wildlifewebsite.com/bear/alaskan-brown-bear-with-salmon-97.html


Salmon replenish nutrients
Salmon Replenish Nutrients mainly political.

  • Salmon carcasses contribute significantly to the nitrogen capital in freshwater systems.

  • One study found that 18% of the nitrogen in riparian plants along a coho salmon spawning stream was of marine origin.

Robert E. Bilby & Peter A. Bisson, Nutrient Enrichment of Riparian Areas by Spawning Salmon, (1997), (citing Bilby, et al.), athttp://www.onrc.washington.edu/research/pnw/1997/NutrientEnrichmentofRiparianAreasbySpawningSalmon.htm


How to breach the dams
How to Breach the Dams mainly political.

  • Slowly lower reservoir levels to prevent erosion;

  • Remove the earthen embankment, and leave the concrete locks and powerhouses dry.

  • Breaching all four lower Snake dams would take about 4-7 years.

    Blumm at note 32 (citing Bill Loftus, How To Breach A

    Dam, Lewiston Morning Trib., June 7, 1998, at 1D).


Breaching ice harbor dam
Breaching Ice Harbor Dam mainly political.

Before After

http://www.wildsalmon.org/about/partially.htm


Energy issues

Energy Issues: mainly political.

How much power do the dams actually produce?

Picture of the generator room at Lower Monumental http://www.theslowlane.com/91tripb/gen.html


The terms
The Terms: mainly political.

  • Watts - measure instantaneous use of power – for example, a 100-watt light bulb uses 100 watts per hour.

  • Megawatt – one million watts.

  • Megawatt hours (MWH)– the actual output of megawatts for a period of time.

  • Average megawatt hours (aMW) – the average output of a power source per hour.

    • For example, on March 1 Lower Granite produced 5,880 MWH, so 5,880/24 = 245 aMW.

      Bob Bellemare, What is a Megawatt? (June 24, 2003), athttp://www.utilipoint.com/issuealert/print.asp?id=1728


Energy production of the lower snake dams march 2004

Energy Production of the Lower Snake Dams: March, 2004 mainly political.

(note, this is near-peak production time for these dams)


Lower granite
Lower Granite mainly political.

  • MWH for all of March – 228,304

  • aMW – 307 (to calculate this, take the MWH for the whole month and divide by 31 days and then divide by 24 hours).

Lower Granite – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Energy Production of Lower Granite Dam, (Mar. 2004), at http:// www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/ftppub/project_data/daily/lwg.txt


Little goose
Little Goose mainly political.

  • MWH for March – 225,374

  • aMW - 303

Little Goose - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Energy Production of Little Goose Dam, (Mar. 2004), athttp://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/ftppub/project_data/daily/lgs.txt


Lower monumental
Lower Monumental mainly political.

  • MWH for March – 239,406

  • aMW - 322

Lower Monumental - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Energy Production of Lower Monumental Dam, (Mar. 2004), athttp://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/ftppub/project_data/daily/lmn.txt


Ice harbor
Ice Harbor mainly political.

  • MWH for March – 232,540

  • aMW – 313

Ice Harbor - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Energy Production of Ice Harbor Dam, (Mar. 2004), athttp://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/ftppub/project_data/daily/ihr.txt



What is the relevant total power produced
What is the relevant total power produced? Northwest?

  • Bonneville Power Administration (the federal agency that sells power to the utilities) serves most of Idaho, Oregon, Washington and part of Montana and Canada.

     Bonneville Power Administration, Who Are We? (April 7, 2004),

at http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/About_BPA/

http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/About_BPA/


Idaho
Idaho Northwest?

  • Electric generation for all of 2002: 9,786,933 MWH

  • 1117 aMW (I calculated this by taking 9,786,933 divided by 365 days and then divided by 24 hours).

Energy Information Administration, State Electricity Profiles, 2002, (Dec. 2002), athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/idaho.pdf


Washington
Washington Northwest?

  • Electric Generation for all of 2002: 102,765,048 MWH

  • 11,731 aMW

Energy Information Administration, State Electricity Profiles, 2002, (Dec. 2002), athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/washington.pdf


Oregon
Oregon Northwest?

  • Electric Generation for all of 2002: 47,099,368 MWH

  • 5,376 aMW

Energy Information Administration, State Electricity Profiles, 2002, (Dec. 2002), athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/oregon.pdf


The lower snake river dams power contribution
The Lower Snake River Dams’ Power Contribution Northwest?

  • The power produced by the 3 states: 18,224 aMW.*

  • The power produced by the four lower Snake River dams: 1,245 aMW.

  • At the highest production time for the dams (Spring) the dams only produce 6.8% of the energy in the Northwest.

    * This is not including the power produced in western Montana and western Canada, which is still part of the Bonneville Power Administration’s service area.



Northwest power sources
Northwest Power Sources Northwest?

Northwest Power and Conservation Council http://www.nwppc.org/energy/powersupply/source.htm


Problems with using the dams as an energy source
Problems with Using the Dams as an Energy Source Northwest?

  • The power is not produced evenly throughout the year.

  • The dams produce power in relation to the flow of the Snake River.

  • The Snake River levels fluctuate with the seasons, which means the dams produce the most power when the consumers least need it (Spring).


Snake river levels
Snake River Levels Northwest?

Median Flow of the Snake River at Nyssa, Oregon

United States Geological Services, Monthly Streamflow Statistics for Idaho: USGS 13213100 SNAKE RIVER AT

NYSSA, OR, (April 10, 2004), at http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/id/nwis/monthly/?site_no=13213100&agency_cd=USGS


Cost of breaching the dams
Cost of Breaching the Dams Northwest?

  • Studies have found that breaching the dam and replacing the power with renewableenergy sources (instead of just conserving the power) would raise each household’s energy costs by $1-5 per month.

American Rivers, The Facts on Salmon, Energy and the Snake River Dams (last visited April 7, 2004)(citing Natural Resource Defense Council, Going with the Flow: Replacing the Four Lower Snake Dams, (2000)), athttp://www.amrivers.org/doc_repository/SnakeRiver/SnakeEnergyFinal.pdf; See also U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study, Power System Analysis, (July 1999), athttp://www.nww.usace.army.mil/lsr/NEWS/info5.htm (finding that the average cost to consumers would be $1-5 extra per month).


Can we breach the dams and still have a reliable energy supply
Can We Breach the Dams and Still Have a Reliable Energy Supply?

  • The lower Snake River dams only produce 6.8% of the Northwest’s power supply at their near-peak production time.

  • There are many ways to replace this power. For example….


Energy efficiency
Energy Efficiency Supply?

  • In response to the black-outs, California instituted a very successful energy efficiency campaign.

  • Electricity use fell 6 % in the first nine months of 2001 compared to the same period during 2000.

  • Peak use dropped even more. For example, in June, peak demand dropped 12 %.

  • Northwest consumers could similarly reduce their power consumption.

Natural Resource Defense Council, Energy Conservation Solves a Crisis, (Dec. 31, 2001), at http://www.nrdc.org/air/energy/fcal2001.asp


Other options to replace the power
Other Options to Replace the Power Supply?

  • Solar

  • Wind

  • Bioenergy

  • Geothermal

  • Hydrogen

http://www.imaginationsolar.com/Gallery/sp_w_pv.htm

http://www.acclaimimages.com/_gallery/_pages/0023-0310-1018-2454.html

http://www.ece.umr.edu/links/power/Energy_Course/energy/Renewables/geotherm/pictures/geysers6.jpg


Information on renewable energy
Information on Renewable Energy Supply?

  • For research and general information on these renewable energy sources, as well as policy arguments,

  • See Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology, Renewable Energy Policy Project, (last visited April 12, 2004), athttp://solstice.crest.org/index.html.


Conclusions
Conclusions Supply?

  • It is possible to maintain energy reliability and breach the dams.

  • We would lose at most 6.8% power at near-peak production times.

  • We could either reduce demand or replace this power with renewable energy sources.

  • We would save the salmon and fulfill the ESA and Native American treaty obligations.


ad